Literature DB >> 11719660

Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation.

J M Boone1, T R Nelson, K K Lindfors, J A Seibert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of breast computed tomography (CT) in terms of radiation dose and image quality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Validated Monte Carlo simulation techniques were used to estimate the average glandular dose (AGD). The calculated photon fluence at the detector for high-quality abdominal CT (120 kVp, 300 mAs, 5-mm section thickness) was the benchmark for assessing the milliampere seconds and corresponding radiation dose necessary for breast CT. Image noise was measured by using a 10-cm-diameter cylinder imaged with a clinical CT scanner at 10-300 mAs for 80, 100, and 120 kVp. A cadaveric breast was imaged in the coronal plane to approximate the acquisition geometry of a proposed breast CT scanner.
RESULTS: The AGD for 80-kVp breast CT was comparable to that for two-view mammography of 5-cm breasts (compressed breast thickness). For thicker breasts, the breast CT dose was about one-third less than that for two-view mammography. The maximum dose at mammography assessed in 1-mm(3) voxels was far higher (20.0 mGy) than that at breast CT (5.4 mGy) for a typical 5-cm 50% glandular breast. CT images of an 8-cm cadaveric breast (AGD, 6.3 mGy) were subjectively superior to digital mammograms (AGD, 10.1 mGy) of the same specimen.
CONCLUSION: The potential of high signal-to-noise ratio images with low anatomic noise, which are obtainable at dose levels comparable to those for mammography, suggests that dedicated breast CT should be studied further for its potential in breast cancer screening and diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11719660     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2213010334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  135 in total

1.  High resolution dual detector volume-of-interest cone beam breast CT--Demonstration with a bench top system.

Authors:  Youtao Shen; Ying Yi; Yuncheng Zhong; Chao-Jen Lai; Xinming Liu; Zhicheng You; Shuaiping Ge; Tianpeng Wang; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Management of patient dose and image noise in routine pediatric CT abdominal examinations.

Authors:  Francis R Verdun; D Lepori; Pascal Monnin; Jean-François Valley; Pierre Schnyder; F Gudinchet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  A perceptual evaluation of JPEG 2000 image compression for digital mammography: contrast-detail characteristics.

Authors:  Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham; Sandra M Waldrop; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  An analysis of the mechanical parameters used for finite element compression of a high-resolution 3D breast phantom.

Authors:  Christina M L Hsu; Mark L Palmeri; W Paul Segars; Alexander I Veress; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Multimodal hard X-ray imaging of a mammography phantom at a compact synchrotron light source.

Authors:  Simone Schleede; Martin Bech; Klaus Achterhold; Guillaume Potdevin; Martin Gifford; Rod Loewen; Cecile Limborg; Ronald Ruth; Franz Pfeiffer
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.616

6.  The quantitative potential for breast tomosynthesis imaging.

Authors:  Christina M Shafer; Ehsan Samei; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Evaluation of an improved algorithm for producing realistic 3D breast software phantoms: application for mammography.

Authors:  K Bliznakova; S Suryanarayanan; A Karellas; N Pallikarakis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A novel solid-angle tomosynthesis (SAT) scanning scheme.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Cedric Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  Recent and future directions in CT imaging.

Authors:  Norbert J Pelc
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.