Literature DB >> 22149826

High resolution dual detector volume-of-interest cone beam breast CT--Demonstration with a bench top system.

Youtao Shen1, Ying Yi, Yuncheng Zhong, Chao-Jen Lai, Xinming Liu, Zhicheng You, Shuaiping Ge, Tianpeng Wang, Chris C Shaw.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study, we used a small field high resolution detector in conjunction with a full field flat panel detector to implement and investigate the dual detector volume-of-interest (VOI) cone beam breast computed tomography (CBCT) technique on a bench-top system. The potential of using this technique to image small calcifications without increasing the overall dose to the breast was demonstrated. Significant reduction of scatter components in the high resolution projection image data of the VOI was also shown.
METHODS: With the regular flat panel based CBCT technique, exposures were made at 80 kVp to generate an air kerma of 6 mGys at the isocenter. With the dual detector VOI CBCT technique, a high resolution small field CMOS detector was used to scan a cylindrical VOI (2.5 cm in diameter and height, 4.5 cm off-center) with collimated x-rays at four times of regular exposure level. A flat panel detector was used for full field scan with low x-ray exposures at half of the regular exposure level. The low exposure full field image data were used to fill in the truncated space in the VOI scan data and generate a complete projection image set. The Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK) filtered backprojection algorithm was used to reconstruct high resolution images for the VOI. Two scanning techniques, one breast centered and the other VOI centered, were implemented and investigated. Paraffin cylinders with embedded thin aluminum (Al) wires were imaged and used in conjunction with optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dose measurements to demonstrate the ability of this technique to image small calcifications without increasing the mean glandular dose (MGD).
RESULTS: Using exposures that produce an air kerma of 6 mGys at the isocenter, the regular CBCT technique was able to resolve the cross-sections of Al wires as thin as 254 μm in diameter in the phantom. For the specific VOI studied, by increasing the exposure level by a factor of 4 for the VOI scan and reducing the exposure level by a factor of 2 for the full filed scan, the dual-detector CBCT technique was able to resolve the cross-sections of Al wires as thin as 152 μm in diameter. The CNR evaluated for the entire Al wire cross-section was found to be improved from 5.5 in regular CBCT to 14.4 and 16.8 with the breast centered and VOI centered scanning techniques, respectively. Even inside VOI center, the VOI scan resulted in significant dose saving with the dose reduced by a factor of 1.6 at the VOI center. Dose saving outside the VOI was substantial with the dose reduced by a factor of 7.3 and 7.8 at the breast center for the breast centered and VOI centered scans, respectively, when compared to full field scan at the same exposure level. The differences between the two dual detector techniques in terms of dose saving and scatter reduction were small with VOI scan at 4× exposure level and full field scan at 0.5 × exposure level. The MGDs were only 94% of that from the regular CBCT scan.
CONCLUSIONS: For the specific VOI studied, the dual detector VOI CBCT technique has the potential to provide high quality images inside the VOI with MGD similar to or even lower than that of full field breast CBCT. It was also found that our results were compromised by the use of inadequate detectors for the VOI scan. An appropriately selected detector would better optimize the image quality improvement that can be achieved with the VOI CBCT technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22149826      PMCID: PMC3230641          DOI: 10.1118/1.3656040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  24 in total

Review 1.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential.

Authors:  James T Dobbins; Devon J Godfrey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Microcalcification detection using cone-beam CT mammography with a flat-panel imager.

Authors:  Xing Gong; Aruna A Vedula; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Volume-of-interest (VOI) imaging in C-arm flat-detector CT for high image quality at reduced dose.

Authors:  Daniel Kolditz; Yiannis Kyriakou; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Performance of dedicated emission mammotomography for various breast shapes and sizes.

Authors:  C N Brzymialkiewicz; M P Tornai; R L McKinley; S J Cutler; J E Bowsher
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A reconstruction algorithm from truncated projections.

Authors:  K Ogawa; M Nakajima; S Yuta
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Dynamic helical CT mammography of breast cancer.

Authors:  Akira Yamamoto; Hitoshi Fukushima; Ryuji Okamura; Yoshiaki Nakamura; Taisuke Morimoto; Yoji Urata; Sumio Mukaihara; Katsumi Hayakawa
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2006-01

Review 7.  Recent advances in dosimetry using the optically stimulated luminescence of Al2O3:C.

Authors:  Stephen W S McKeever; Michael W Blair; Enver Bulur; Razvan Gaza; Ramona Gaza; Regina Kalchgruber; David M Klein; Eduardo G Yukihara
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 8.  The false-negative mammogram.

Authors:  P T Huynh; A M Jarolimek; S Daye
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Mammographic calcifications and risk of subsequent breast cancer.

Authors:  D B Thomas; J Whitehead; C Dorse; B A Threatt; F I Gilbert; A J Present; T Carlile
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-02-03       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  John M Lewin; Carl J D'Orsi; R Edward Hendrick; Lawrence J Moss; Pamela K Isaacs; Andrew Karellas; Gary R Cutter
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  7 in total

1.  A general method for cupping artifact correction of cone-beam breast computed tomography images.

Authors:  Xiaolei Qu; Chao-Jen Lai; Yuncheng Zhong; Ying Yi; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Radiation doses in volume-of-interest breast computed tomography--A Monte Carlo simulation study.

Authors:  Chao-Jen Lai; Yuncheng Zhong; Ying Yi; Tianpeng Wang; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Tight-frame based iterative image reconstruction for spectral breast CT.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Hao Gao; Huanjun Ding; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Simulated lesion, human observer performance comparison between thin-section dedicated breast CT images versus computed thick-section simulated projection images of the breast.

Authors:  L Chen; J M Boone; C K Abbey; J Hargreaves; C Bateni; K K Lindfors; K Yang; A Nosratieh; A Hernandez; P Gazi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Development of a patient-specific two-compartment anthropomorphic breast phantom.

Authors:  Nicolas D Prionas; George W Burkett; Sarah E McKenney; Lin Chen; Robin L Stern; John M Boone
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Cone beam CT for determining breast cancer margin: an initial experience and its comparison with mammography and specimen radiograph.

Authors:  Juan Yao; Chris Shaw; C J Lai; John Rong; Jian Wang; Wenya Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

7.  Dual-dictionary learning-based iterative image reconstruction for spectral computed tomography application.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Huanjun Ding; Yang Lu; Ge Wang; Jun Zhao; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.609

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.