Literature DB >> 28432828

Quantitative contrast-enhanced spectral mammography based on photon-counting detectors: A feasibility study.

Huanjun Ding1, Sabee Molloi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of accurate quantification of iodine mass thickness in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A computer simulation model was developed to evaluate the performance of a photon-counting spectral mammography system in the application of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography. A figure-of-merit (FOM), which was defined as the decomposed iodine signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) with respect to the square root of the mean glandular dose (MGD), was chosen to optimize the imaging parameters, in terms of beam energy, splitting energy, and prefiltrations for breasts of various thicknesses and densities. Experimental phantom studies were also performed using a beam energy of 40 kVp and a splitting energy of 34 keV with 3 mm Al prefiltration. A two-step calibration method was investigated to quantify the iodine mass thickness, and was validated using phantoms composed of a mixture of glandular and adipose materials, for various breast thicknesses and densities. Finally, the traditional dual-energy log-weighted subtraction method was also studied as a comparison. The measured iodine signal from both methods was compared to the known value to characterize the quantification accuracy and precision.
RESULTS: The optimal imaging parameters, which lead to the highest FOM, were found at a beam energy between 42 and 46 kVp with a splitting energy at 34 keV. The optimal tube voltage decreased as the breast thickness or the Al prefiltration increased. The proposed quantification method was able to measure iodine mass thickness on phantoms of various thicknesses and densities with high accuracy. The root-mean-square (RMS) error for cm-scale lesion phantoms was estimated to be 0.20 mg/cm2 . The precision of the technique, characterized by the standard deviation of the measurements, was estimated to be 0.18 mg/cm2 . The traditional weighted subtraction method also predicted a linear correlation between the measured signal and the known iodine mass thickness. However, the correlation slope and offset values were strongly dependent on the total breast thickness and density.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that iodine mass thickness for cm-scale lesions can be accurately quantified with contrast-enhanced spectral mammography. The quantitative information can potentially improve the differential power for malignancy.
© 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contrast-enhanced spectral mammography; dual energy; material decomposition

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28432828      PMCID: PMC5553693          DOI: 10.1002/mp.12296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  61 in total

1.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.

Authors:  J M Boone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Karla Kerlikowske; Chris I Flowers; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Weiwei Zhu; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Early detection of breast cancer: mammography.

Authors:  C J D'Orsi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Early detection of breast cancer the second time around: mammography in women with a personal history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 6.  Detectors for the future of X-ray imaging.

Authors:  M Aslund; E Fredenberg; M Telman; M Danielsson
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 0.972

7.  Imaging of nanoparticles with dual-energy computed tomography.

Authors:  J L Ducote; Y Alivov; S Molloi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Development of low-dose photon-counting contrast-enhanced tomosynthesis with spectral imaging.

Authors:  Florian F Schmitzberger; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Rüdiger Lawaczeck; Magnus Hemmendorff; Elin Moa; Mats Danielsson; Ulrich Bick; Susanne Diekmann; Alexander Pöllinger; Florian J Engelken; Felix Diekmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Correlation between blood and lymphatic vessel density and results of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.

Authors:  Elzbieta Luczynska; Joanna Niemiec; Aleksandra Ambicka; Agnieszka Adamczyk; Tomasz Walasek; Janusz Ryś; Beata Sas-Korczyńska
Journal:  Pol J Pathol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.072

10.  Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A I Mushlin; R W Kouides; D E Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  1 in total

1.  Characterization of a GaAs photon-counting detector for mammography.

Authors:  Bahaa Ghammraoui; Spyridon Gkoumas; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-06-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.