Literature DB >> 19778621

The folding fingerprint of visual cortex reveals the timing of human V1 and V2.

Justin Ales1, Thom Carney, Stanley A Klein.   

Abstract

Primate neocortex contains over 30 visual areas. Recent techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have successfully identified many of these areas in the human brain, but have been of limited value for revealing the temporal dynamics between visual areas. The electroencephalogram (EEG) provides information with high temporal precision, but has had limited success separating out the signals from individual neighboring cortical areas. Consequently, controversies exist over the temporal dynamics across cortical areas. In order to address this problem we developed a new method to identify the sources of the EEG. An individual's unique cortical pattern of sulci and gyri along with a visual area's functional retinotopic layout provides a folding fingerprint that predicts specific scalp topographies for stimuli presented in different parts of the visual field. Using this folding fingerprint with a 96 or 192 location stimulus severely constrains the solution space making it relatively easy to extract the temporal response of multiple visual areas to multiple stimulus locations. The large number of stimuli also provides a means to validate the waveforms by comparing across stimulus sets, an important feature not present in most EEG source identification procedures. Using this method our data reveal that both V1 and V2 waveforms have similar onset latencies, and their temporal dynamics provide new information regarding the response latencies of these areas in humans. Our method enables the previously unattainable separation of EEG responses from neighboring brain areas. While we applied the method to the first two cortical visual areas, V1 and V2, this method is also applicable to somatosensory areas that have defined mappings. This method provides a means to study the rapid information flow in the human brain to reveal top-down and bottom-up cognitive processes. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19778621      PMCID: PMC2818454          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  32 in total

1.  Using multi-stimulus VEP source localization to obtain a retinotopic map of human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  S D Slotnick; S A Klein; T Carney; E Sutter; S Dastmalchi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Intermodal selective attention in monkeys. I: distribution and timing of effects across visual areas.

Authors:  A D Mehta; I Ulbert; C E Schroeder
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface.

Authors:  B Fischl; M I Sereno; R B Tootell; A M Dale
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.

Authors:  J C Mosher; R M Leahy; P S Lewis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Topographic organization of human visual areas in the absence of input from primary cortex.

Authors:  H A Baseler; A B Morland; B A Wandell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Methods for quantifying intra- and inter-subject variability of evoked potential data applied to the multifocal visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Sangita Dandekar; Justin Ales; Thom Carney; Stanley A Klein
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Source estimates for MEG/EEG visual evoked responses constrained by multiple, retinotopically-mapped stimulus locations.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler; Eric Halgren; Antigona Martinez; Mingxiong Huang; Steven A Hillyard; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Signal timing across the macaque visual system.

Authors:  M T Schmolesky; Y Wang; D P Hanes; K G Thompson; S Leutgeb; J D Schall; A G Leventhal
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction.

Authors:  A M Dale; B Fischl; M I Sereno
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Two-dimensional mapping of the central and parafoveal visual field to human visual cortex.

Authors:  Mark M Schira; Alex R Wade; Christopher W Tyler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  16 in total

1.  Increasing the accuracy of electromagnetic inverses using functional area source correlation constraints.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Justin M Ales; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  From evoked potentials to cortical currents: Resolving V1 and V2 components using retinotopy constrained source estimation without fMRI.

Authors:  Samuel A Inverso; Xin-Lin Goh; Linda Henriksson; Simo Vanni; Andrew C James
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The cruciform model of striate generation of the early VEP, re-illustrated, not revoked: a reply to Ales et al. (2013).

Authors:  Simon P Kelly; M Isabel Vanegas; Charles E Schroeder; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Effects of attentional load on early visual processing depend on stimulus timing.

Authors:  Karsten Rauss; Gilles Pourtois; Patrik Vuilleumier; Sophie Schwartz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Visual field asymmetries in visual evoked responses.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  V1 is not uniquely identified by polarity reversals of responses to upper and lower visual field stimuli.

Authors:  Justin M Ales; Jacob L Yates; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Modulation of early cortical processing during divided attention to non-contiguous locations.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Frey; Anita M Schmid; Jeremy W Murphy; Sophie Molholm; Edmund C Lalor; John J Foxe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Improved method for retinotopy constrained source estimation of visual-evoked responses.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 9.  How to use fMRI functional localizers to improve EEG/MEG source estimation.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Justin M Ales; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Optimization of retinotopy constrained source estimation constrained by prior.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.