Literature DB >> 22102418

Improved method for retinotopy constrained source estimation of visual-evoked responses.

Donald J Hagler1, Anders M Dale.   

Abstract

Retinotopy constrained source estimation (RCSE) is a method for noninvasively measuring the time courses of activation in early visual areas using magnetoencephalography (MEG) or electroencephalography (EEG). Unlike conventional equivalent current dipole or distributed source models, the use of multiple, retinotopically mapped stimulus locations to simultaneously constrain the solutions allows for the estimation of independent waveforms for visual areas V1, V2, and V3, despite their close proximity to each other. We describe modifications that improve the reliability and efficiency of this method. First, we find that increasing the number and size of visual stimuli results in source estimates that are less susceptible to noise. Second, to create a more accurate forward solution, we have explicitly modeled the cortical point spread of individual visual stimuli. Dipoles are represented as extended patches on the cortical surface, which take into account the estimated receptive field size at each location in V1, V2, and V3 as well as the contributions from contralateral, ipsilateral, dorsal, and ventral portions of the visual areas. Third, we implemented a map fitting procedure to deform a template to match individual subject retinotopic maps derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). This improves the efficiency of the overall method by allowing automated dipole selection, and it makes the results less sensitive to physiological noise in fMRI retinotopy data. Finally, the iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) method was used to reduce the contribution from stimulus locations with high residual error for robust estimation of visual evoked responses.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22102418      PMCID: PMC3299883          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  62 in total

1.  Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity.

Authors:  A M Dale; A K Liu; B R Fischl; R L Buckner; J W Belliveau; J D Lewine; E Halgren
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.

Authors:  Arthur K Liu; Anders M Dale; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Functional analysis of V3A and related areas in human visual cortex.

Authors:  R B Tootell; J D Mendola; N K Hadjikhani; P J Ledden; A K Liu; J B Reppas; M I Sereno; A M Dale
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Improbable areas in the visual brain.

Authors:  S Zeki
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Estimates of visually evoked cortical currents.

Authors:  S P Ahlfors; R J Ilmoniemi; M S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-03

6.  Wiener filter-magnetoencephalography of visual cortical activity.

Authors:  S Kajihara; Y Ohtani; N Goda; M Tanigawa; Y Ejima; K Toyama
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex.

Authors:  Dahlia Sharon; Matti S Hämäläinen; Roger B H Tootell; Eric Halgren; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Geometrically accurate topology-correction of cortical surfaces using nonseparating loops.

Authors:  Florent Ségonne; Jenni Pacheco; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Individually shaped volume conductor models of the head in EEG source localisation.

Authors:  F Zanow; M J Peters
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Functional measurements of human ventral occipital cortex: retinotopy and colour.

Authors:  Alex R Wade; Alyssa A Brewer; Jochem W Rieger; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  9 in total

1.  From evoked potentials to cortical currents: Resolving V1 and V2 components using retinotopy constrained source estimation without fMRI.

Authors:  Samuel A Inverso; Xin-Lin Goh; Linda Henriksson; Simo Vanni; Andrew C James
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The cruciform model of striate generation of the early VEP, re-illustrated, not revoked: a reply to Ales et al. (2013).

Authors:  Simon P Kelly; M Isabel Vanegas; Charles E Schroeder; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Visual field asymmetries in visual evoked responses.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  How to use fMRI functional localizers to improve EEG/MEG source estimation.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Justin M Ales; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Optimization of retinotopy constrained source estimation constrained by prior.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Localization of MEG human brain responses to retinotopic visual stimuli with contrasting source reconstruction approaches.

Authors:  Nela Cicmil; Holly Bridge; Andrew J Parker; Mark W Woolrich; Kristine Krug
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Sparse EEG/MEG source estimation via a group lasso.

Authors:  Michael Lim; Justin M Ales; Benoit R Cottereau; Trevor Hastie; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A visual encoding model links magnetoencephalography signals to neural synchrony in human cortex.

Authors:  Eline R Kupers; Noah C Benson; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  A population receptive field model of the magnetoencephalography response.

Authors:  Eline R Kupers; Akhil Edadan; Noah C Benson; Wietske Zuiderbaan; Maartje C de Jong; Serge O Dumoulin; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 6.556

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.