Literature DB >> 18570197

Source estimates for MEG/EEG visual evoked responses constrained by multiple, retinotopically-mapped stimulus locations.

Donald J Hagler1, Eric Halgren, Antigona Martinez, Mingxiong Huang, Steven A Hillyard, Anders M Dale.   

Abstract

Studying the human visual system with high temporal resolution is a significant challenge due to the limitations of the available, noninvasive measurement tools. MEG and EEG provide the millisecond temporal resolution necessary for answering questions about intracortical communication involved in visual processing, but source estimation is ill-posed and unreliable when multiple; simultaneously active areas are located close together. To address this problem, we have developed a retinotopy-constrained source estimation method to calculate the time courses of activation in multiple visual areas. Source estimation was disambiguated by: (1) fixing MEG/EEG generator locations and orientations based on fMRI retinotopy and surface tessellations constructed from high-resolution MRI images; and (2) solving for many visual field locations simultaneously in MEG/EEG responses, assuming source current amplitudes to be constant or varying smoothly across the visual field. Because of these constraints on the solutions, estimated source waveforms become less sensitive to sensor noise or random errors in the specification of the retinotopic dipole models. We demonstrate the feasibility of this method and discuss future applications such as studying the timing of attentional modulation in individual visual areas. 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18570197      PMCID: PMC2754810          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  97 in total

1.  Bayesian inference applied to the electromagnetic inverse problem.

Authors:  D M Schmidt; J S George; C C Wood
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention.

Authors:  J A Brefczynski; E A DeYoe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Functional MRI studies of human visual motion perception: texture, luminance, attention and after-effects.

Authors:  Adriane E Seiffert; David C Somers; Anders M Dale; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Laminar excitability cycles in neocortex.

Authors:  D S Barth; S Di
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Accounting for nonlinear BOLD effects in fMRI: parameter estimates and a model for prediction in rapid event-related studies.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Alberto Vazquez; Luis Hernandez; Douglas C Noll
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Coupling of the cortical hemodynamic response to cortical and thalamic neuronal activity.

Authors:  Anna Devor; Istvan Ulbert; Andrew K Dunn; Suresh N Narayanan; Stephanie R Jones; Mark L Andermann; David A Boas; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom.

Authors:  R M Leahy; J C Mosher; M E Spencer; M X Huang; J D Lewine
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-08

Review 8.  Brain mapping in animals and humans.

Authors:  M I Sereno
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Relations between EEG phenomena and potentials of single cortical cells. I. Evoked responses after thalamic and erpicortical stimulation.

Authors:  O D Creutzfeldt; S Watanabe; H D Lux
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1966-01

10.  Visual topography of human intraparietal sulcus.

Authors:  Jascha D Swisher; Mark A Halko; Lotfi B Merabet; Stephanie A McMains; David C Somers
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  27 in total

1.  Increasing the accuracy of electromagnetic inverses using functional area source correlation constraints.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Justin M Ales; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  From evoked potentials to cortical currents: Resolving V1 and V2 components using retinotopy constrained source estimation without fMRI.

Authors:  Samuel A Inverso; Xin-Lin Goh; Linda Henriksson; Simo Vanni; Andrew C James
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The cruciform model of striate generation of the early VEP, re-illustrated, not revoked: a reply to Ales et al. (2013).

Authors:  Simon P Kelly; M Isabel Vanegas; Charles E Schroeder; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Effects of attentional load on early visual processing depend on stimulus timing.

Authors:  Karsten Rauss; Gilles Pourtois; Patrik Vuilleumier; Sophie Schwartz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Visual field asymmetries in visual evoked responses.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Effects of Stimulus Size and Contrast on the Initial Primary Visual Cortical Response in Humans.

Authors:  Nigel Gebodh; M Isabel Vanegas; Simon P Kelly
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Mixed-norm estimates for the M/EEG inverse problem using accelerated gradient methods.

Authors:  Alexandre Gramfort; Matthieu Kowalski; Matti Hämäläinen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  V1 is not uniquely identified by polarity reversals of responses to upper and lower visual field stimuli.

Authors:  Justin M Ales; Jacob L Yates; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The folding fingerprint of visual cortex reveals the timing of human V1 and V2.

Authors:  Justin Ales; Thom Carney; Stanley A Klein
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  How to use fMRI functional localizers to improve EEG/MEG source estimation.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Justin M Ales; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.