Literature DB >> 17673298

Methods for quantifying intra- and inter-subject variability of evoked potential data applied to the multifocal visual evoked potential.

Sangita Dandekar1, Justin Ales, Thom Carney, Stanley A Klein.   

Abstract

Differences in cortical geometry within and between subjects can complicate multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) and standard evoked potential (EP) intra- and inter-subject comparisons. We present methods for aligning temporal intra- and inter-subject data prior to comparison. Multiple groups have informally observed that the two dominant temporal principal components (PCs) of the pattern reversal visual evoked potential (VEP) obtained with singular value decomposition (SVD) exhibit little inter-subject variability relative to the inter-subject variability of the raw VEP. We present methods that employ the temporal PCs to formally quantify intra- and inter-subject variability of the mfVEP. When SVD was applied to data from eight subjects separately, it was found that two PCs accounted for, on average, 73% of intra-subject variance. When a single SVD was applied to combined data from multiple subjects, it was found that two PCs accounted for 67% of inter-subject variance. We used the 2D temporal subspaces derived from SVD as a basis for intra- and inter-subject comparisons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17673298      PMCID: PMC2040344          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  15 in total

1.  Darkness beyond the light: attentional inhibition surrounding the classic spotlight.

Authors:  Scott D Slotnick; Joseph B Hopfinger; Stanley A Klein; Erich E Sutter
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs.

Authors:  Brad Fortune; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The spatial distribution of selective attention assessed using the multifocal visual evoked potential.

Authors:  William Seiple; Colleen Clemens; Vivienne C Greenstein; Karen Holopigian; Xian Zhang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The pattern-pulse multifocal visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Andrew Charles James
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  A principal component analysis of multifocal pattern reversal VEP.

Authors:  Xian Zhang; Donald C Hood
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field.

Authors:  H A Baseler; E E Sutter; S A Klein; T Carney
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-01

7.  Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  E A DeYoe; G J Carman; P Bandettini; S Glickman; J Wieser; R Cox; D Miller; J Neitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI.

Authors:  S A Engel; G H Glover; B A Wandell
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Principal components analysis for source localization of VEPs in man.

Authors:  J Maier; G Dagnelie; H Spekreijse; B W van Dijk
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The mosaic of midget ganglion cells in the human retina.

Authors:  D M Dacey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  4 in total

1.  From evoked potentials to cortical currents: Resolving V1 and V2 components using retinotopy constrained source estimation without fMRI.

Authors:  Samuel A Inverso; Xin-Lin Goh; Linda Henriksson; Simo Vanni; Andrew C James
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Visual field asymmetries in visual evoked responses.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Changes in neurovascular coupling with cerebral perfusion pressure indicate a link to cerebral autoregulation.

Authors:  Deepshikha Acharya; Alexander Ruesch; Samantha Schmitt; Jason Yang; Matthew A Smith; Jana M Kainerstorfer
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 6.960

4.  The folding fingerprint of visual cortex reveals the timing of human V1 and V2.

Authors:  Justin Ales; Thom Carney; Stanley A Klein
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 6.556

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.