Literature DB >> 25527151

Visual field asymmetries in visual evoked responses.

Donald J Hagler1.   

Abstract

Behavioral responses to visual stimuli exhibit visual field asymmetries, but cortical folding and the close proximity of visual cortical areas make electrophysiological comparisons between different stimulus locations problematic. Retinotopy-constrained source estimation (RCSE) uses distributed dipole models simultaneously constrained by multiple stimulus locations to provide separation between individual visual areas that is not possible with conventional source estimation methods. Magnetoencephalography and RCSE were used to estimate time courses of activity in V1, V2, V3, and V3A. Responses to left and right hemifield stimuli were not significantly different. Peak latencies for peripheral stimuli were significantly shorter than those for perifoveal stimuli in V1, V2, and V3A, likely related to the greater proportion of magnocellular input to V1 in the periphery. Consistent with previous results, sensor magnitudes for lower field stimuli were about twice as large as for upper field, which is only partially explained by the proximity to sensors for lower field cortical sources in V1, V2, and V3. V3A exhibited both latency and amplitude differences for upper and lower field responses. There were no differences for V3, consistent with previous suggestions that dorsal and ventral V3 are two halves of a single visual area, rather than distinct areas V3 and VP.
© 2014 ARVO.

Keywords:  MEG; RCSE; V1; V2; V3; V3A; VP; electrophysiology; fMRI; retinotopy; visual area; visual field asymmetry; visual processing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25527151      PMCID: PMC4274841          DOI: 10.1167/14.14.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  126 in total

1.  Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity.

Authors:  A M Dale; A K Liu; B R Fischl; R L Buckner; J W Belliveau; J D Lewine; E Halgren
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.

Authors:  Arthur K Liu; Anders M Dale; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Evidence for a modified V3 with dorsal and ventral halves in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  David C Lyon; Jon H Kaas
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Bypassing V1: a direct geniculate input to area MT.

Authors:  Lawrence C Sincich; Ken F Park; Melville J Wohlgemuth; Jonathan C Horton
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-19       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Source cancellation profiles of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Andrei Irimia; John Darrell Van Horn; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Reorganization of global form and motion processing during human visual development.

Authors:  John Wattam-Bell; Dee Birtles; Pär Nyström; Claes von Hofsten; Kerstin Rosander; Shirley Anker; Janette Atkinson; Oliver Braddick
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  An MEG study into the visual perception of apparent motion in depth.

Authors:  Chia-Yen Yang; Jen-Chuen Hsieh; Yin Chang
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  V1 is not uniquely identified by polarity reversals of responses to upper and lower visual field stimuli.

Authors:  Justin M Ales; Jacob L Yates; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Improved method for retinotopy constrained source estimation of visual-evoked responses.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Visual latencies in areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  L G Nowak; M H Munk; P Girard; J Bullier
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.241

View more
  14 in total

1.  Structural and functional correlates of visual field asymmetry in the human brain by diffusion kurtosis MRI and functional MRI.

Authors:  Caitlin O'Connell; Leon C Ho; Matthew C Murphy; Ian P Conner; Gadi Wollstein; Rakie Cham; Kevin C Chan
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Hemispheric differences in electrical and hemodynamic responses during hemifield visual stimulation with graded contrasts.

Authors:  Juanning Si; Xin Zhang; Yujin Zhang; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Detailed spatiotemporal brain mapping of chromatic vision combining high-resolution VEP with fMRI and retinotopy.

Authors:  Sabrina Pitzalis; Francesca Strappini; Alessandro Bultrini; Francesco Di Russo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Fullfield and extrafoveal visual evoked potentials in healthy eyes: reference data for a curved OLED display.

Authors:  Sabine Baumgarten; Tabea Hoberg; Tibor Lohmann; Babac Mazinani; Peter Walter; Antonis Koutsonas
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Contrast Normalization Accounts for Binocular Interactions in Human Striate and Extra-striate Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Spero C Nicholas; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Topographic organization of areas V3 and V4 and its relation to supra-areal organization of the primate visual system.

Authors:  M J Arcaro; S Kastner
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.241

7.  Sensitivity to the visual field origin of natural image patches in human low-level visual cortex.

Authors:  Damien J Mannion
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Radial Frequency Analysis of Contour Shapes in the Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Viljami R Salmela; Linda Henriksson; Simo Vanni
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Violated Expectations in the Cyberball Paradigm: Testing the Expectancy Account of Social Participation With ERP.

Authors:  Katharina Schuck; Michael Niedeggen; Rudolf Kerschreiter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-25

10.  Influence of BOLD Contributions to Diffusion fMRI Activation of the Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Rebecca J Williams; David C Reutens; Julia Hocking
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.