Literature DB >> 23868690

Optimization of retinotopy constrained source estimation constrained by prior.

Donald J Hagler1.   

Abstract

Studying how the timing and amplitude of visual evoked responses (VERs) vary between visual areas is important for understanding visual processing but is complicated by difficulties in reliably estimating VERs in individual visual areas using noninvasive brain measurements. Retinotopy constrained source estimation (RCSE) addresses this challenge by using multiple, retinotopically mapped stimulus locations to simultaneously constrain estimates of VERs in visual areas V1, V2, and V3, taking advantage of the spatial precision of fMRI retinotopy and the temporal resolution of magnetoencephalography (MEG) or electroencephalography (EEG). Nonlinear optimization of dipole locations, guided by a group-constrained RCSE solution as a prior, improved the robustness of RCSE. This approach facilitated the analysis of differences in timing and amplitude of VERs between V1, V2, and V3, elicited by stimuli with varying luminance contrast in a sample of eight adult humans. The V1 peak response was 37% larger than that of V2 and 74% larger than that of V3, and also ~10-20 ms earlier. Normalized contrast response functions were nearly identical for the three areas. Results without dipole optimization, or with other nonlinear methods not constrained by prior estimates were similar but suffered from greater between-subject variability. The increased reliability of estimates offered by this approach may be particularly valuable when using a smaller number of stimulus locations, enabling a greater variety of stimulus and task manipulations.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MEG; V1; V2; V3; VER; fMRI; retinotopy; source estimation; visual evoked response

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23868690      PMCID: PMC4586264          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  65 in total

1.  Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity.

Authors:  A M Dale; A K Liu; B R Fischl; R L Buckner; J W Belliveau; J D Lewine; E Halgren
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.

Authors:  Arthur K Liu; Anders M Dale; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Wiener filter-magnetoencephalography of visual cortical activity.

Authors:  S Kajihara; Y Ohtani; N Goda; M Tanigawa; Y Ejima; K Toyama
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex.

Authors:  Dahlia Sharon; Matti S Hämäläinen; Roger B H Tootell; Eric Halgren; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  A spatiotemporal profile of visual system activation revealed by current source density analysis in the awake macaque.

Authors:  C E Schroeder; A D Mehta; S J Givre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1998 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  V1 is not uniquely identified by polarity reversals of responses to upper and lower visual field stimuli.

Authors:  Justin M Ales; Jacob L Yates; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Improved method for retinotopy constrained source estimation of visual-evoked responses.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Quantitative fiber tracking analysis of the optic radiation correlated with visual performance in premature newborns.

Authors:  J I Berman; H C Glass; S P Miller; P Mukherjee; D M Ferriero; A J Barkovich; D B Vigneron; R G Henry
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Brain size and folding of the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Roberto Toro; Michel Perron; Bruce Pike; Louis Richer; Suzanne Veillette; Zdenka Pausova; Tomás Paus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  On the estimation of population-specific synaptic currents from laminar multielectrode recordings.

Authors:  Sergey L Gratiy; Anna Devor; Gaute T Einevoll; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.081

View more
  7 in total

1.  From evoked potentials to cortical currents: Resolving V1 and V2 components using retinotopy constrained source estimation without fMRI.

Authors:  Samuel A Inverso; Xin-Lin Goh; Linda Henriksson; Simo Vanni; Andrew C James
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Visual field asymmetries in visual evoked responses.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Effects of Stimulus Size and Contrast on the Initial Primary Visual Cortical Response in Humans.

Authors:  Nigel Gebodh; M Isabel Vanegas; Simon P Kelly
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Excitatory Contribution to Binocular Interactions in Human Visual Cortex Is Reduced in Strabismic Amblyopia.

Authors:  Chuan Hou 侯川; Terence L Tyson; Ismet J Uner; Spero C Nicholas; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Sparse EEG/MEG source estimation via a group lasso.

Authors:  Michael Lim; Justin M Ales; Benoit R Cottereau; Trevor Hastie; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A visual encoding model links magnetoencephalography signals to neural synchrony in human cortex.

Authors:  Eline R Kupers; Noah C Benson; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  A population receptive field model of the magnetoencephalography response.

Authors:  Eline R Kupers; Akhil Edadan; Noah C Benson; Wietske Zuiderbaan; Maartje C de Jong; Serge O Dumoulin; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 6.556

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.