Literature DB >> 26870938

From evoked potentials to cortical currents: Resolving V1 and V2 components using retinotopy constrained source estimation without fMRI.

Samuel A Inverso1,2,3, Xin-Lin Goh1,2, Linda Henriksson4,5, Simo Vanni5,6, Andrew C James1,2.   

Abstract

Despite evoked potentials' (EP) ubiquity in research and clinical medicine, insights are limited to gross brain dynamics as it remains challenging to map surface potentials to their sources in specific cortical regions. Multiple sources cancellation due to cortical folding and cross-talk obscures close sources, e.g. between visual areas V1 and V2. Recently retinotopic functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) responses were used to constrain source locations to assist separating close sources and to determine cortical current generators. However, an fMRI is largely infeasible for routine EP investigation. We developed a novel method that replaces the fMRI derived retinotopic layout (RL) by an approach where the retinotopy and current estimates are generated from EEG or MEG signals and a standard clinical T1-weighted anatomical MRI. Using the EEG-RL, sources were localized to within 2 mm of the fMRI-RL constrained localized sources. The EEG-RL also produced V1 and V2 current waveforms that closely matched the fMRI-RL's (n = 2) r(1,198)  = 0.99, P < 0.0001. Applying the method to subjects without fMRI (n = 4) demonstrates it generates waveforms that agree closely with the literature. Our advance allows investigators with their current EEG or MEG systems to create a library of brain models tuned to individual subjects' cortical folding in retinotopic maps, and should be applicable to auditory and somatosensory maps. The novel method developed expands EP's ability to study specific brain areas, revitalizing this well-worn technique. Hum Brain Mapp 37:1696-1709, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  EEG; dipole model; fMRI; retinotopy constrained source estimation; visual evoked current; visual evoked potential

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26870938      PMCID: PMC6867263          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  70 in total

1.  EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.

Authors:  J C Mosher; R M Leahy; P S Lewis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Bruce Fischl; André van der Kouwe; Christophe Destrieux; Eric Halgren; Florent Ségonne; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Larry J Seidman; Jill Goldstein; David Kennedy; Verne Caviness; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Segmentation of skull and scalp in 3-D human MRI using mathematical morphology.

Authors:  Belma Dogdas; David W Shattuck; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Improved method for retinotopy constrained source estimation of visual-evoked responses.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Insidious errors in dipole parameters due to shell model misspecification using multiple time-points.

Authors:  Z Zhang; D L Jewett; G Goodwill
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  MEG beamforming using Bayesian PCA for adaptive data covariance matrix regularization.

Authors:  Mark Woolrich; Laurence Hunt; Adrian Groves; Gareth Barnes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Optimization of retinotopy constrained source estimation constrained by prior.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Two-dimensional mapping of the central and parafoveal visual field to human visual cortex.

Authors:  Mark M Schira; Alex R Wade; Christopher W Tyler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  EEG and MEG data analysis in SPM8.

Authors:  Vladimir Litvak; Jérémie Mattout; Stefan Kiebel; Christophe Phillips; Richard Henson; James Kilner; Gareth Barnes; Robert Oostenveld; Jean Daunizeau; Guillaume Flandin; Will Penny; Karl Friston
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-06

10.  Retinotopic maps, spatial tuning, and locations of human visual areas in surface coordinates characterized with multifocal and blocked FMRI designs.

Authors:  Linda Henriksson; Juha Karvonen; Niina Salminen-Vaparanta; Henry Railo; Simo Vanni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  A visual encoding model links magnetoencephalography signals to neural synchrony in human cortex.

Authors:  Eline R Kupers; Noah C Benson; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  A population receptive field model of the magnetoencephalography response.

Authors:  Eline R Kupers; Akhil Edadan; Noah C Benson; Wietske Zuiderbaan; Maartje C de Jong; Serge O Dumoulin; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 6.556

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.