Literature DB >> 10097460

EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.

J C Mosher1, R M Leahy, P S Lewis.   

Abstract

A solution of the forward problem is an important component of any method for computing the spatio-temporal activity of the neural sources of magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) data. The forward problem involves computing the scalp potentials or external magnetic field at a finite set of sensor locations for a putative source configuration. We present a unified treatment of analytical and numerical solutions of the forward problem in a form suitable for use in inverse methods. This formulation is achieved through factorization of the lead field into the product of the moment of the elemental current dipole source with a "kernel matrix" that depends on the head geometry and source and sensor locations, and a "sensor matrix" that models sensor orientation and gradiometer effects in MEG and differential measurements in EEG. Using this formulation and a recently developed approximation formula for EEG, based on the "Berg parameters," we present novel reformulations of the basic EEG and MEG kernels that dispel the myth that EEG is inherently more complicated to calculate than MEG. We also present novel investigations of different boundary element methods (BEM's) and present evidence that improvements over currently published BEM methods can be realized using alternative error-weighting methods. Explicit expressions for the matrix kernels for MEG and EEG for spherical and realistic head geometries are included.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10097460     DOI: 10.1109/10.748978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  161 in total

1.  Fast realistic modeling in bioelectromagnetism using lead-field interpolation.

Authors:  B Yvert; A Crouzeix-Cheylus; J Pernier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Increasing the accuracy of electromagnetic inverses using functional area source correlation constraints.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Justin M Ales; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  A cortical potential imaging study from simultaneous extra- and intracranial electrical recordings by means of the finite element method.

Authors:  Yingchun Zhang; Lei Ding; Wim van Drongelen; Kurt Hecox; David M Frim; Bin He
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Simultaneous EEG and MEG source reconstruction in sparse electromagnetic source imaging.

Authors:  Lei Ding; Han Yuan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  GENERALIZED SIDELOBE CANCELLER FOR MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY ARRAYS.

Authors:  John C Mosher; Matti S Hämäläinen; Dimitrios Pantazis; Hua Brian Hui; Richard C Burgess; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2009-08-07

6.  Temporal microstructure of cortical networks (TMCN) underlying task-related differences.

Authors:  Arpan Banerjee; Ajay S Pillai; Justin R Sperling; Jason F Smith; Barry Horwitz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Source cancellation profiles of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Andrei Irimia; John Darrell Van Horn; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation.

Authors:  Seppo P Ahlfors; Jooman Han; John W Belliveau; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Temporal Information of Directed Causal Connectivity in Multi-Trial ERP Data using Partial Granger Causality.

Authors:  Vahab Youssofzadeh; Girijesh Prasad; Muhammad Naeem; KongFatt Wong-Lin
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2016-01

10.  Variability of magnetoencephalographic sensor sensitivity measures as a function of age, brain volume and cortical area.

Authors:  Andrei Irimia; Matthew J Erhart; Timothy T Brown
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.