Literature DB >> 17360817

Two-dimensional mapping of the central and parafoveal visual field to human visual cortex.

Mark M Schira1, Alex R Wade, Christopher W Tyler.   

Abstract

Primate visual cortex contains a set of maps of visual space. These maps are fundamental to early visual processing, yet their form is not fully understood in humans. This is especially true for the central and most important part of the visual field--the fovea. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure the mapping geometry of human V1 and V2 down to 0.5 degrees of eccentricity. By applying automated atlas fitting procedures to parametrize and average retinotopic measurements of eight brains, we provide a reference standard for the two-dimensional geometry of human early visual cortex of unprecedented precision and analyze this high-quality mean dataset with respect to the 2-dimensional cortical magnification morphometry. The analysis indicates that 1) area V1 has meridional isotropy in areal projection: equal areas of visual space are mapped to equal areas of cortex at any given eccentricity. 2) V1 has a systematic pattern of local anisotropies: cortical magnification varies between isopolar and isoeccentricity lines, and 3) the shape of V1 deviates systematically from the complex-log model, the fit of which is particularly poor close to the fovea. We therefore propose that human V1 be fitted by models based on an equal-area principle of its two-dimensional magnification. 4) V2 is elongated by a factor of 2 in eccentricity direction relative to V1 and has significantly more local anisotropy. We propose that V2 has systematic intrinsic curvature, but V1 is intrinsically flat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17360817     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00972.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  40 in total

1.  From evoked potentials to cortical currents: Resolving V1 and V2 components using retinotopy constrained source estimation without fMRI.

Authors:  Samuel A Inverso; Xin-Lin Goh; Linda Henriksson; Simo Vanni; Andrew C James
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Serge O Dumoulin; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Independent components in stimulus-related BOLD signals and estimation of the underlying neural responses.

Authors:  C W Tyler; L L Kontsevich; T C Ferree
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Occipital network for figure/ground organization.

Authors:  Lora T Likova; Christopher W Tyler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Source estimates for MEG/EEG visual evoked responses constrained by multiple, retinotopically-mapped stimulus locations.

Authors:  Donald J Hagler; Eric Halgren; Antigona Martinez; Mingxiong Huang; Steven A Hillyard; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Computational models of spatial updating in peri-saccadic perception.

Authors:  Fred H Hamker; Marc Zirnsak; Arnold Ziesche; Markus Lappe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Selective Modulation of Early Visual Cortical Activity by Movement Intention.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Craig S Chapman; Daniel J Gale; J Randall Flanagan; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Figure-ground processing during fixational saccades in V1: indication for higher-order stability.

Authors:  Ariel Gilad; Yair Pesoa; Inbal Ayzenshtat; Hamutal Slovin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The folding fingerprint of visual cortex reveals the timing of human V1 and V2.

Authors:  Justin Ales; Thom Carney; Stanley A Klein
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Modeling magnification and anisotropy in the primate foveal confluence.

Authors:  Mark M Schira; Christopher W Tyler; Branka Spehar; Michael Breakspear
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.