Literature DB >> 19749216

Carotid artery stents: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5T and 3T.

M Lettau1, A Sauer, S Heiland, S Rohde, M Bendszus, S Hähnel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: CT angiography (CTA) and MR angiography (MRA) are increasingly used methods for evaluation of stented vessel segments. Our aim was to compare CTA, contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) at 1.5T, and CE-MRA at 3T for the visualization of carotid artery stents and to define the best noninvasive imaging technique as an alternative to conventional angiography for each stent.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CTA and CE-MRA appearances of 18 carotid artery stents of different designs and sizes (4.0 to 10.0 mm) were investigated in vitro. For each stent, artificial lumen narrowing (ALN) was calculated.
RESULTS: With CE-MRA at 3T and at 1.5T, ALN in most nitinol stents was lower than that in the groups of stainless steel and cobalt alloy stents. In most nitinol stents and in both cobalt alloy stents, ALN was lower on CE-MRA at 3T than at 1.5T. In all stainless steel stents, ALN was lower on CTA than on CE-MRA. With CTA and CE-MRA, in most stents ALN decreased with increasing stent diameter.
CONCLUSIONS: CTA and CE-MRA evaluation of vessel patency after stent placement is possible but is considerably impaired by ALN. Investigators should be informed about the method of choice for every stent. Stent manufacturers should be aware of potential artifacts caused by their stents during noninvasive diagnostic methods such as CTA and CE-MRA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19749216      PMCID: PMC7051281          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  25 in total

1.  Improved in-stent magnetic resonance angiography with high flip angle excitation.

Authors:  J M Meyer; A Buecker; E Spuentrup; K Schuermann; M Huetten; R D Hilgers; J J van Vaals; R W Guenther
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Stent appearance at contrast-enhanced MR angiography: in vitro examination with 14 stents.

Authors:  M Lenhart; M Völk; C Manke; W R Nitz; M Strotzer; S Feuerbach; J Link
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  3.0 Tesla contrast-enhanced MR angiography of carotid artery stents: in vitro measurements as compared with 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  S Hähnel; T H Nguyen-Trong; S Rohde; M Hartmann; C Braun; K Sartor; S Heiland
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.447

4.  Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial.

Authors:  Hans-Henning Eckstein; Peter Ringleb; Jens-Rainer Allenberg; Jürgen Berger; Gustav Fraedrich; Werner Hacke; Michael Hennerici; Robert Stingele; Jens Fiehler; Hermann Zeumer; Olav Jansen
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 44.182

5.  The clinical value of methods to measure carotid stenosis.

Authors:  C F Bladin; N A Alexandrova; J Murphy; A V Alexandrov; R Maggisano; J W Norris
Journal:  Int Angiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  Simulation of susceptibility artifacts in 2D and 3D Fourier transform spin-echo and gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C J Bakker; R Bhagwandien; M A Moerland; L M Ramos
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study.

Authors:  M Bendszus; M Koltzenburg; R Burger; M Warmuth-Metz; E Hofmann; L Solymosi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-11-06       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Artifact-free in-stent lumen visualization by standard magnetic resonance angiography using a new metallic magnetic resonance imaging stent.

Authors:  Arno Buecker; Elmar Spuentrup; Alexander Ruebben; Rolf W Günther
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Metallic artifacts of coronary and iliac arteries stents in MR angiography and contrast-enhanced CT.

Authors:  Y Amano; M Ishihara; H Hayashi; K Gemma; H Kawamata; M Amano; T Kumazaki
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.605

10.  Comparative MRI compatibility of 316 L stainless steel alloy and nickel-titanium alloy stents.

Authors:  Andrea Holton; Edward Walsh; Andreas Anayiotos; Gerald Pohost; Ramakrishna Venugopalan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  15 in total

1.  [CT diagnostics of carotid artery stenosis].

Authors:  W Reith; C Roth
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Comparing different MR angiography strategies of carotid stents in a vascular flow model: toward stent-specific recommendations in MR follow-up.

Authors:  Andreas M J Frölich; Sara M Pilgram-Pastor; Marios N Psychogios; Alexander Mohr; Michael Knauth
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Follow-up assessment of coiled intracranial aneurysms using zTE MRA as compared with TOF MRA: a preliminary image quality study.

Authors:  Song'an Shang; Jing Ye; Xianfu Luo; Jianxun Qu; Yong Zhen; Jingtao Wu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Angiographic CT: in vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents-does stent orientation matter?

Authors:  Michael Lettau; Martin Bendszus; Stefan Hähnel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Off-resonance magnetic resonance angiography improves visualization of in-stent lumen in peripheral nitinol stents compared to conventional T1-weighted acquisitions: an in vitro comparison study.

Authors:  Gitsios Gitsioudis; Philipp Fortner; Matthias Stuber; Anna Missiou; Florian Andre; Oliver J Müller; Hugo A Katus; Grigorios Korosoglou
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Outcome Study of the Pipeline Embolization Device with Shield Technology in Unruptured Aneurysms (PEDSU).

Authors:  D Atasoy; N Kandasamy; J Hart; J Lynch; S-H Yang; D Walsh; C Tolias; T C Booth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  CT angiography: current technology and clinical use.

Authors:  Kanako K Kumamaru; Bernice E Hoppel; Richard T Mather; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA for follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device.

Authors:  S R Boddu; F C Tong; S Dehkharghani; J E Dion; A M Saindane
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  Imaging of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Richard A P Takx; Sasan Partovi; Brian B Ghoshhajra
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  CE-MRA for follow-up of aneurysms post stent-assisted coiling.

Authors:  R Agid; M Schaaf; Ri Farb
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 1.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.