Song'an Shang1, Jing Ye2, Xianfu Luo2, Jianxun Qu3, Yong Zhen4, Jingtao Wu5. 1. Department of Radiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China. 2. Department of Radiology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225001, China. 3. MR Enhanced Application, GE Healthcare, Beijing, 100176, China. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225001, China. 5. Department of Radiology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225001, China. wujingtaodoctor@126.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To prospectively assess coiled intracranial aneurysms using a novel non-contrast enhanced zero echo time (zTE) MR angiography (MRA) method, and compare its image quality with time-of-flight (TOF) MRA, using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as reference. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (10 males and 15 females; age 53.96 ± 12.46 years) were enrolled in this monocentric study. MRA sequences were performed 24 h before DSA. Susceptibility artefact intensity and flow signal within the parent artery were carried out using a 4-point scale. Occlusion status was assessed using the 3-grade Montreal scale. RESULTS: Scores of zTE were higher than TOF for both susceptibility artefact intensity (3.42 ± 0.64, 2.92 ± 0.63, P = 0.01) and flow signal (3.66 ± 0.95, 3.24 ± 1.24, P = 0.01). DSA revealed 17 complete occlusions, five residual neck aneurysms and two residual aneurysms. Inter-observer agreement was excellent (weighted κ: 0.89) for zTE and good (weighted κ: 0.68) for TOF. Intermodality agreement was excellent for zTE (weighted κ: 0.95) and good for TOF (weighted κ: 0.80). Correlations of both MRA sequences with DSA were high (zTE, Spearman's ρ: 0.91; TOF, Spearman's ρ: 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: zTE MRA showed promising results for follow-up assessment of coiled intracranial aneurysms and was superior to TOF MRA for visualizing the parent artery and evaluating occlusion status. KEY POINTS: • Various MRA sequences were applied for follow-up assessment of coiled intracranial aneurysms. • zTE MRA was less sensitive to susceptibility artefacts and haemodynamics. • In this monocentric study, zTE MRA was equivalent to DSA. • zTE MRA maybe an alternative to TOF MRA for follow-up assessment.
OBJECTIVES: To prospectively assess coiled intracranial aneurysms using a novel non-contrast enhanced zero echo time (zTE) MR angiography (MRA) method, and compare its image quality with time-of-flight (TOF) MRA, using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as reference. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (10 males and 15 females; age 53.96 ± 12.46 years) were enrolled in this monocentric study. MRA sequences were performed 24 h before DSA. Susceptibility artefact intensity and flow signal within the parent artery were carried out using a 4-point scale. Occlusion status was assessed using the 3-grade Montreal scale. RESULTS: Scores of zTE were higher than TOF for both susceptibility artefact intensity (3.42 ± 0.64, 2.92 ± 0.63, P = 0.01) and flow signal (3.66 ± 0.95, 3.24 ± 1.24, P = 0.01). DSA revealed 17 complete occlusions, five residual neck aneurysms and two residual aneurysms. Inter-observer agreement was excellent (weighted κ: 0.89) for zTE and good (weighted κ: 0.68) for TOF. Intermodality agreement was excellent for zTE (weighted κ: 0.95) and good for TOF (weighted κ: 0.80). Correlations of both MRA sequences with DSA were high (zTE, Spearman's ρ: 0.91; TOF, Spearman's ρ: 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: zTE MRA showed promising results for follow-up assessment of coiled intracranial aneurysms and was superior to TOF MRA for visualizing the parent artery and evaluating occlusion status. KEY POINTS: • Various MRA sequences were applied for follow-up assessment of coiled intracranial aneurysms. • zTE MRA was less sensitive to susceptibility artefacts and haemodynamics. • In this monocentric study, zTE MRA was equivalent to DSA. • zTE MRA maybe an alternative to TOF MRA for follow-up assessment.
Authors: Andrew J Molyneux; Richard S C Kerr; Ly-Mee Yu; Mike Clarke; Mary Sneade; Julia A Yarnold; Peter Sandercock Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Sep 3-9 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: You Na Kim; Jin Wook Choi; Yong Cheol Lim; Jihye Song; Ji Hyun Park; Woo Sang Jung Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 3.500