Literature DB >> 12549230

Comparative MRI compatibility of 316 L stainless steel alloy and nickel-titanium alloy stents.

Andrea Holton1, Edward Walsh, Andreas Anayiotos, Gerald Pohost, Ramakrishna Venugopalan.   

Abstract

The initial success of coronary stenting is leading to a proliferation in peripheral stenting. A significant portion of the stents used in a clinical setting are made of 316 low carbon stainless steel (SS). Other alloys that have been used for stent manufacture include tantalum, MP35N, and nickel-titanium (NiTi). The ferromagnetic properties of SS cause the production of artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The NiTi alloys, in addition to being known for their shape memory or superelastic properties, have been shown to exhibit reduced interference in MRI. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine the comparative MRI compatibility of SS and NiTi stents. Both gradient echo and spin-echo images were obtained at 1.5 and 4.1 T field strengths. The imaging of stents of identical geometry but differing compositions permitted the quantification of artifacts produced due to device composition by normalizing the radio frequency shielding effects. These images were analyzed for magnitude and spatial extent of signal loss within the lumen and outside the stent. B1 mapping was used to quantify the attenuation throughout the image. The SS stent caused significant signal loss and did not allow for visibility of the lumen. However, the NiTi stent caused only minor artifacting and even allowed for visualization of the signal from within the lumen. In addition, adjustments to the flip angle of standard imaging protocols were shown to improve the quality of signal from within the lumen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12549230     DOI: 10.1081/jcmr-120016381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


  16 in total

1.  Magnetic stents retain nanoparticle-bound antirestenotic drugs transported by lipid microbubbles.

Authors:  T Räthel; H Mannell; J Pircher; B Gleich; U Pohl; F Krötz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of patients with airway stents.

Authors:  Yang Xia; Rui Jin; Wen Li; Huahao Shen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Multi-imager compatible actuation principles in surgical robotics.

Authors:  D Stoianovici
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.547

Review 4.  Porous NiTi for bone implants: a review.

Authors:  A Bansiddhi; T D Sargeant; S I Stupp; D C Dunand
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Carotid artery stents: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5T and 3T.

Authors:  M Lettau; A Sauer; S Heiland; S Rohde; M Bendszus; S Hähnel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Optimized protocols for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with thoracic metallic implants.

Authors:  Laura J Olivieri; Russell R Cross; Kendall E O'Brien; Kanishka Ratnayaka; Michael S Hansen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-06-04

7.  Angiographic CT: in vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents-does stent orientation matter?

Authors:  Michael Lettau; Martin Bendszus; Stefan Hähnel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Carotid stent delivery in an XMR suite: immediate assessment of the physiologic impact of extracranial revascularization.

Authors:  Alastair J Martin; David A Saloner; Timothy P L Roberts; Heidi Roberts; Oliver M Weber; William Dillon; Sean Cullen; Van Halbach; Christopher F Dowd; Randall T Higashida
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Design, development, and evaluation of an MRI-guided SMA spring-actuated neurosurgical robot.

Authors:  Mingyen Ho; Yeongjin Kim; Shing Shin Cheng; Rao Gullapalli; Jaydev P Desai
Journal:  Int J Rob Res       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 4.703

10.  In vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents: a pixel-by-pixel analysis using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 and 3 T.

Authors:  Michael Lettau; Annett Sauer; Sabine Heiland; Stefan Rohde; Julia Reinhardt; Martin Bendszus; Stefan Hähnel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.