S Hähnel1, T H Nguyen-Trong, S Rohde, M Hartmann, C Braun, K Sartor, S Heiland. 1. Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Stefan_Haehnel@med.uni-heidelberg.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To assess the appearance of carotid artery stents at 3.0 Tesla contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) as compared with 1.5 Tesla. METHODS: 19 stents (GUIDANT Acculink, GUIDANT Dynalink, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SMART Neuroform, GUIDANT Omnilink, EV3 Protege, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC Carotid Wallstent, ABBOTT Xact) of different materials (nitinol, stainless steal, cobalt alloy) and different sizes (4.0 mm-10.0 mm) were investigated regarding their appearance on CE-MRA at 3.0 Tesla and at 1.5 Tesla. For each stent artificial lumen narrowing (ALN) was calculated based on a pixel-by-pixel profile of the contrast-to-noise-ratio giving an objective indicator for the size of the evaluable stent diameter. RESULTS: Only in two stents (Omnilink 7.0 mm, Omnilink 10.0 mm) was ALN higher at 3.0 Tesla relative to 1.5 Tesla. In all other stents ALN at 3.0 Tesla was the same or even lower as compared with 1.5 Tesla. In contrast to the ferromagnetic stents where ALN was typically higher than 85%, in most of the nitinol stents (Acculink, Dynalink, Neuroform, Protege) ALN was below 35%. In the Xact stents ALN was generally 100% at 1.5 Tesla and ranged between 31.8% and 100% at 3.0 Tesla. CONCLUSION: CE-MRA after carotid artery stenting is considerably impaired by ALN both at 1.5 Tesla and at 3.0 Tesla. Nevertheless, CE-MRA is well suited for the examination of carotid artery stents made of nitinol at both field strengths. Stent manufacturers should be aware of potential artifacts caused by their stents during noninvasive diagnostic methods such as CE-MRA.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To assess the appearance of carotid artery stents at 3.0 Tesla contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) as compared with 1.5 Tesla. METHODS: 19 stents (GUIDANT Acculink, GUIDANT Dynalink, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SMART Neuroform, GUIDANT Omnilink, EV3 Protege, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC Carotid Wallstent, ABBOTT Xact) of different materials (nitinol, stainless steal, cobalt alloy) and different sizes (4.0 mm-10.0 mm) were investigated regarding their appearance on CE-MRA at 3.0 Tesla and at 1.5 Tesla. For each stent artificial lumen narrowing (ALN) was calculated based on a pixel-by-pixel profile of the contrast-to-noise-ratio giving an objective indicator for the size of the evaluable stent diameter. RESULTS: Only in two stents (Omnilink 7.0 mm, Omnilink 10.0 mm) was ALN higher at 3.0 Tesla relative to 1.5 Tesla. In all other stents ALN at 3.0 Tesla was the same or even lower as compared with 1.5 Tesla. In contrast to the ferromagnetic stents where ALN was typically higher than 85%, in most of the nitinol stents (Acculink, Dynalink, Neuroform, Protege) ALN was below 35%. In the Xact stents ALN was generally 100% at 1.5 Tesla and ranged between 31.8% and 100% at 3.0 Tesla. CONCLUSION: CE-MRA after carotid artery stenting is considerably impaired by ALN both at 1.5 Tesla and at 3.0 Tesla. Nevertheless, CE-MRA is well suited for the examination of carotid artery stents made of nitinol at both field strengths. Stent manufacturers should be aware of potential artifacts caused by their stents during noninvasive diagnostic methods such as CE-MRA.
Authors: Andreas M J Frölich; Sara M Pilgram-Pastor; Marios N Psychogios; Alexander Mohr; Michael Knauth Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Gitsios Gitsioudis; Philipp Fortner; Matthias Stuber; Anna Missiou; Florian Andre; Oliver J Müller; Hugo A Katus; Grigorios Korosoglou Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Michael Lettau; Annett Sauer; Sabine Heiland; Stefan Rohde; Julia Reinhardt; Martin Bendszus; Stefan Hähnel Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2009-11-19 Impact factor: 2.804