Literature DB >> 19673835

Melodic contour identification and music perception by cochlear implant users.

John J Galvin1, Qian-Jie Fu, Robert V Shannon.   

Abstract

Research and outcomes with cochlear implants (CIs) have revealed a dichotomy in the cues necessary for speech and music recognition. CI devices typically transmit 16-22 spectral channels, each modulated slowly in time. This coarse representation provides enough information to support speech understanding in quiet and rhythmic perception in music, but not enough to support speech understanding in noise or melody recognition. Melody recognition requires some capacity for complex pitch perception, which in turn depends strongly on access to spectral fine structure cues. Thus, temporal envelope cues are adequate for speech perception under optimal listening conditions, while spectral fine structure cues are needed for music perception. In this paper, we present recent experiments that directly measure CI users' melodic pitch perception using a melodic contour identification (MCI) task. While normal-hearing (NH) listeners' performance was consistently high across experiments, MCI performance was highly variable across CI users. CI users' MCI performance was significantly affected by instrument timbre, as well as by the presence of a competing instrument. In general, CI users had great difficulty extracting melodic pitch from complex stimuli. However, musically experienced CI users often performed as well as NH listeners, and MCI training in less-experienced subjects greatly improved performance. With fixed constraints on spectral resolution, such as occurs with hearing loss or an auditory prosthesis, training and experience can provide considerable improvements in music perception and appreciation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19673835      PMCID: PMC3627487          DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04551.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  32 in total

1.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Performance of cochlear implant patients as a function of time.

Authors:  L G Spivak; S B Waltzman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1990-09

3.  Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Vocal emotion recognition by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-12

5.  Effect of a competing instrument on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Sandra I Oba
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Hugh McDermott; Colette McKay; Louise Hickson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Music recognition, music listening, and word recognition by deaf children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Chisato Mitani; Takayuki Nakata; Sandra E Trehub; Yukihiko Kanda; Hidetaka Kumagami; Kenji Takasaki; Ikue Miyamoto; Haruo Takahashi
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Advantages of cochlear implantation in prelingual deaf children before 2 years of age when compared with later implantation.

Authors:  Manuel Manrique; Francisco Javier Cervera-Paz; Alicia Huarte; Maite Molina
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  33 in total

1.  Influence of pitch, timbre and timing cues on melodic contour identification with a competing masker (L).

Authors:  Meimei Zhu; Bing Chen; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Music Therapy for Preschool Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll; Maura Kenworthy; Tanya Van Voorst
Journal:  Music Ther Perspect       Date:  2011-06

3.  Benefits of music training in mandarin-speaking pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin; Xiaosong Wang; Jiunn-Liang Wu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study of the Impact of Online Music Training on Pitch and Timbre Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Nicole T Jiam; Mickael L Deroche; Patpong Jiradejvong; Charles J Limb
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-27

5.  The perception of emotion and focus prosody with varying acoustic cues in cochlear implant simulations with varying filter slopes.

Authors:  Daan J van de Velde; Niels O Schiller; Vincent J van Heuven; Claartje C Levelt; Joost van Ginkel; Mieke Beers; Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Low-frequency fine-structure cues allow for the online use of lexical stress during spoken-word recognition in spectrally degraded speech.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of hearing loss on the subcortical representation of speech cues.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Travis White-Schwoch; Sarah Drehobl; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory Training: Evidence for Neural Plasticity in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Perspect Hear Hear Disord Res Res Diagn       Date:  2013-05

9.  MUSIC APPRECIATION AND TRAINING FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS: A REVIEW.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2012-11-19

10.  Melodic pitch perception and lexical tone perception in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Duoduo Tao; Rui Deng; Ye Jiang; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Bing Chen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.