Literature DB >> 22225012

Influence of pitch, timbre and timing cues on melodic contour identification with a competing masker (L).

Meimei Zhu1, Bing Chen, John J Galvin, Qian-Jie Fu.   

Abstract

Pitch, timbre, and/or timing cues may be used to stream and segregate competing musical melodies and instruments. In this study, melodic contour identification was measured in cochlear implant (CI) and normal-hearing (NH) listeners, with and without a competing masker; timing, pitch, and timbre cues were varied between the masker and target contour. NH performance was near-perfect across different conditions. CI performance was significantly poorer than that of NH listeners. While some CI subjects were able to use or combine timing, pitch and/or timbre cues, most were not, reflecting poor segregation due to poor spectral resolution.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22225012      PMCID: PMC3253593          DOI: 10.1121/1.3658474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Shelley Witt; George Woodworth; Maureen A Mehr; John Knutson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Peggy B Nelson; Su-Hyun Jin; Arlene Earley Carney; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04-22

4.  Pure-tone auditory stream segregation and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Robert S Hong; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory stream segregation with cochlear implants: A preliminary report.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Anastasios Sarampalis; Sandra I Oba
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  K Gfeller; C R Lansing
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-08

Review 7.  Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.

Authors:  Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

8.  Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Hugh McDermott; Colette McKay; Louise Hickson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Effect of instrument timbre on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Sandra Oba
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.482

View more
  8 in total

1.  Channel interaction limits melodic pitch perception in simulated cochlear implants.

Authors:  Joseph D Crew; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech perception with music maskers by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Eskridge; John J Galvin; Justin M Aronoff; Tianhao Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Melodic pitch perception and lexical tone perception in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Duoduo Tao; Rui Deng; Ye Jiang; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Bing Chen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Contributions of electric and acoustic hearing to bimodal speech and music perception.

Authors:  Joseph D Crew; John J Galvin; David M Landsberger; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Joseph D Crew; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Perceptual Plasticity for Auditory Object Recognition.

Authors:  Shannon L M Heald; Stephen C Van Hedger; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-23

7.  Effect of Sound Coding Strategies on Music Perception with a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Gaëlle Leterme; Caroline Guigou; Geoffrey Guenser; Emmanuel Bigand; Alexis Bozorg Grayeli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Melodic Contour Identification Reflects the Cognitive Threshold of Aging.

Authors:  Eunju Jeong; Hokyoung Ryu
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 5.750

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.