Literature DB >> 28147573

Low-frequency fine-structure cues allow for the online use of lexical stress during spoken-word recognition in spectrally degraded speech.

Ying-Yee Kong1, Alexandra Jesse2.   

Abstract

English listeners use suprasegmental cues to lexical stress during spoken-word recognition. Prosodic cues are, however, less salient in spectrally degraded speech, as provided by cochlear implants. The present study examined how spectral degradation with and without low-frequency fine-structure information affects normal-hearing listeners' ability to benefit from suprasegmental cues to lexical stress in online spoken-word recognition. To simulate electric hearing, an eight-channel vocoder spectrally degraded the stimuli while preserving temporal envelope information. Additional lowpass-filtered speech was presented to the opposite ear to simulate bimodal hearing. Using a visual world paradigm, listeners' eye fixations to four printed words (target, competitor, two distractors) were tracked, while hearing a word. The target and competitor overlapped segmentally in their first two syllables but mismatched suprasegmentally in their first syllables, as the initial syllable received primary stress in one word and secondary stress in the other (e.g., "'admiral," "'admi'ration"). In the vocoder-only condition, listeners were unable to use lexical stress to recognize targets before segmental information disambiguated them from competitors. With additional lowpass-filtered speech, however, listeners efficiently processed prosodic information to speed up online word recognition. Low-frequency fine-structure cues in simulated bimodal hearing allowed listeners to benefit from suprasegmental cues to lexical stress during word recognition.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28147573      PMCID: PMC5848870          DOI: 10.1121/1.4972569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  74 in total

1.  On the relative influence of individual harmonics on pitch judgment.

Authors:  H Dai
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Perception of suprasegmental speech features via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant on one ear and hearing aid on the other.

Authors:  Tova Most; Tamar Harel; Talma Shpak; Michal Luntz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Sensitivity to isolated and concurrent intensity and fundamental frequency increments by cochlear implant users under natural listening conditions.

Authors:  Cheryl F Rogers; Eric W Healy; Allen A Montgomery
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Mandarin tone recognition in cochlear-implant subjects.

Authors:  Chao-Gang Wei; Keli Cao; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Shu-Chen Peng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Acoustic temporal modulation detection and speech perception in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Kaibao Nie; Elyse M Jameyson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing.

Authors:  P Zwitserlood
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1989-06

9.  Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds.

Authors:  R J Ritsma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.

Authors:  Shu-Chen Peng; J Bruce Tomblin; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  3 in total

1.  Strategic perceptual weighting of acoustic cues for word stress in listeners with cochlear implants, acoustic hearing, or simulated bimodal hearing.

Authors:  Justin T Fleming; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

2.  Differential weighting of temporal envelope cues from the low-frequency region for Mandarin sentence recognition in noise.

Authors:  Yang Guo; Zhong Zheng; Keyi Li; Yuanyuan Sun; Liang Xia; Di Qian; Yanmei Feng
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.264

3.  A Digital Filter-Based Method for Diagnosing Speech Comprehension Deficits.

Authors:  Gisele V H Koury; Francisca C R da S Araújo; Kauê M Costa; Manoel da Silva Filho
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2021-01-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.