Literature DB >> 28599540

The perception of emotion and focus prosody with varying acoustic cues in cochlear implant simulations with varying filter slopes.

Daan J van de Velde1, Niels O Schiller1, Vincent J van Heuven2, Claartje C Levelt1, Joost van Ginkel3, Mieke Beers4, Jeroen J Briaire4, Johan H M Frijns4.   

Abstract

This study aimed to find the optimal filter slope for cochlear implant simulations (vocoding) by testing the effect of a wide range of slopes on the discrimination of emotional and linguistic (focus) prosody, with varying availability of F0 and duration cues. Forty normally hearing participants judged if (non-)vocoded sentences were pronounced with happy or sad emotion, or with adjectival or nominal focus. Sentences were recorded as natural stimuli and manipulated to contain only emotion- or focus-relevant segmental duration or F0 information or both, and then noise-vocoded with 5, 20, 80, 120, and 160 dB/octave filter slopes. Performance increased with steeper slopes, but only up to 120 dB/octave, with bigger effects for emotion than for focus perception. For emotion, results with both cues most closely resembled results with F0, while for focus results with both cues most closely resembled those with duration, showing emotion perception relies primarily on F0, and focus perception on duration. This suggests that filter slopes affect focus perception less than emotion perception because for emotion, F0 is both more informative and more affected. The performance increase until extreme filter slope values suggests that much performance improvement in prosody perception is still to be gained for CI users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28599540      PMCID: PMC5436976          DOI: 10.1121/1.4982198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  38 in total

1.  Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; J Wygonski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Temporal pitch in electric hearing.

Authors:  Fan Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; D Rainey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Vocal emotion recognition by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-12

5.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for normal-hearing listeners and patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

6.  Assessing the role of spectral and intensity cues in spectral ripple detection and discrimination in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Anderson; Andrew J Oxenham; Peggy B Nelson; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech prosody perception in cochlear implant users with and without residual hearing.

Authors:  Mathieu Marx; Christopher James; Jessica Foxton; Amandine Capber; Bernard Fraysse; Pascal Barone; Olivier Deguine
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Emotions and speech: some acoustical correlates.

Authors:  C E Williams; K N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A laboratory task for induction of mood states.

Authors:  E Velten
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1968-11

Review 10.  Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: a review of the literature on human vocal emotion.

Authors:  I R Murray; J L Arnott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.