Literature DB >> 19275282

Effect of a competing instrument on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users.

John J Galvin1, Qian-Jie Fu, Sandra I Oba.   

Abstract

Cochlear implant (CI) users have limited access to fundamental frequency (F0) and timbre cues, which are needed to segregate competing voices and/or musical instruments. In the present study, CI users' melodic contour identification was measured for three target instruments in the presence of a masker instrument; the F0 of the masker was varied relative to the target instruments. Mean CI performance significantly declined in the presence of the masker, while mean normal-hearing performance was largely unaffected. However, the most musically experienced CI users were able to make use of timbre and F0 differences between instruments.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19275282      PMCID: PMC2677289          DOI: 10.1121/1.3062148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.

Authors:  A E Vandali; L A Whitford; K L Plant; G M Clark
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Shelley Witt; Mary Adamek; Maureen Mehr; Jenny Rogers; Julie Stordahl; Shelly Ringgenberg
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Rachel Cruz; J Ackland Jones; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Better place-coding of the fundamental frequency in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Luc Geurts; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of cochlear implant processing and fundamental frequency on the intelligibility of competing sentences.

Authors:  Ginger S Stickney; Peter F Assmann; Janice Chang; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Hugh McDermott; Colette McKay; Louise Hickson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Effect of instrument timbre on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Sandra Oba
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.482

  8 in total
  16 in total

1.  Influence of pitch, timbre and timing cues on melodic contour identification with a competing masker (L).

Authors:  Meimei Zhu; Bing Chen; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of bandpass filtering on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Reliability measure of a clinical test: Appreciation of Music in Cochlear Implantees (AMICI).

Authors:  Min-Yu Cheng; Jaclyn B Spitzer; Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Dean Mancuso
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 4.  Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Speech perception with music maskers by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Eskridge; John J Galvin; Justin M Aronoff; Tianhao Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Melodic pitch perception and lexical tone perception in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Duoduo Tao; Rui Deng; Ye Jiang; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Bing Chen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Cortical encoding of pitch contour changes in cochlear implant users: a mismatch negativity study.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Chelsea Benson; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Melodic contour identification and music perception by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Temporal feature perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lydia Timm; Deepashri Agrawal; Filipa C Viola; Pascale Sandmann; Stefan Debener; Andreas Büchner; Reinhard Dengler; Matthias Wittfoth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Residual neural processing of musical sound features in adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lydia Timm; Peter Vuust; Elvira Brattico; Deepashri Agrawal; Stefan Debener; Andreas Büchner; Reinhard Dengler; Matthias Wittfoth
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.