Literature DB >> 19673189

An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (executive summary).

S Jeff Shepard1, Jihong Wang, Michael Flynn, Eric Gingold, Lee Goldman, Kerry Krugh, David L Leong, Eugene Mah, Kent Ogden, Donald Peck, Ehsan Samei, Jihong Wang, Charles E Willis.   

Abstract

Digital radiographic imaging systems, such as those using photostimulable storage phosphor, amorphous selenium, amorphous silicon, CCD, and MOSFET technology, can produce adequate image quality over a much broader range of exposure levels than that of screen/film imaging systems. In screen/film imaging, the final image brightness and contrast are indicative of over- and underexposure. In digital imaging, brightness and contrast are often determined entirely by digital postprocessing of the acquired image data. Overexposure and underexposures are not readily recognizable. As a result, patient dose has a tendency to gradually increase over time after a department converts from screen/film-based imaging to digital radiographic imaging. The purpose of this report is to recommend a standard indicator which reflects the radiation exposure that is incident on a detector after every exposure event and that reflects the noise levels present in the image data. The intent is to facilitate the production of consistent, high quality digital radiographic images at acceptable patient doses. This should be based not on image optical density or brightness but on feedback regarding the detector exposure provided and actively monitored by the imaging system. A standard beam calibration condition is recommended that is based on RQA5 but uses filtration materials that are commonly available and simple to use. Recommendations on clinical implementation of the indices to control image quality and patient dose are derived from historical tolerance limits and presented as guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19673189      PMCID: PMC3908678          DOI: 10.1118/1.3121505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  Phototimer setup for CR imaging.

Authors:  E G Christodoulou; M M Goodsit; H P Chan; T W Hepburn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Performance evaluation of computed radiography systems.

Authors:  E Samei; J A Seibert; C E Willis; M J Flynn; E Mah; K L Junck
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Digital radiography with photostimulable storage phosphors. Control of detector latitude in chest imaging.

Authors:  H G Chotas; C E Ravin
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  The ALARA concept in pediatric CR and DR: dose reduction in pediatric radiographic exams--a white paper conference executive summary.

Authors:  C E Willis; T L Slovis
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-10

5.  The current concept of speed should not be used to describe digital imaging systems.

Authors:  Walter Huda
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Computed radiography X-ray exposure trends.

Authors:  J A Seibert; D K Shelton; E H Moore
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Determination of correct AEC function with computed radiography cassettes.

Authors:  L E Wilkinson; J C Heggie
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.430

8.  An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV.

Authors:  J M Boone; J A Seibert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Management of pediatric radiation dose using Canon digital radiography.

Authors:  M Arreola; L Rill
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-10
  9 in total
  26 in total

1.  Quality assurance: a comparison study of radiographic exposure for neonatal chest radiographs at 4 academic hospitals.

Authors:  Mervyn D Cohen; Richard Markowitz; Jeanne Hill; Walter Huda; Paul Babyn; Bruce Apgar
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-11-06

2.  Pediatric digital radiography summit overview: state of confusion.

Authors:  Steven Don
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-05

3.  The standardized exposure index for digital radiography: an opportunity for optimization of radiation dose to the pediatric population.

Authors:  J Anthony Seibert; Richard L Morin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-04-14

4.  Assessment of patient doses in CR examinations throughout a large health region.

Authors:  Yogesh Thakur; Thorarin A Bjarnason; Kevin Hammerstrom; Lorie Marchinkow; Tim Koch; John E Aldrich
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Image Gently: challenges for radiologic technologists when performing digital radiography in children.

Authors:  Marilyn J Goske; Ellen Charkot; Tracy Herrmann; Susan D John; Thalia T Mills; Gregory Morrison; Susan N Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-04-14

6.  Characterization of Continuous and Pulsed Emission modes of a Hybrid Micro Focus X-ray Source for Medical Imaging Applications.

Authors:  Muhammad U Ghani; Molly D Wong; Liqiang Ren; Di Wu; Bin Zheng; John X Rong; Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 1.455

7.  Image Gently pediatric digital radiography summit: executive summary.

Authors:  Steven Don; Marilyn J Goske; Susan John; Bruce Whiting; Charles E Willis
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-01-21

8.  ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for digital radiography.

Authors:  Katherine P Andriole; Thomas G Ruckdeschel; Michael J Flynn; Nicholas J Hangiandreou; A Kyle Jones; Elizabeth Krupinski; J Anthony Seibert; S Jeff Shepard; Alisa Walz-Flannigan; Tariq A Mian; Matthew S Pollack
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  A feasibility study on reduction of the entrance-surface dose to neonates by use of a new digital mobile X-ray system.

Authors:  Satoru Utsunomiya; Hajime Monzen; Mami Akimoto; Nobutaka Mukumoto; Yoshitomo Ishihara; Takehiko Shiinoki; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Yuki Miyabe; Sayaka Sato; Satoru Matsuo; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-10-20

10.  Evaluation of the effects of subject thickness on the exposure index in digital radiography.

Authors:  Takeshi Takaki; Kazuki Takeda; Seiichi Murakami; Haruhisa Ogawa; Masato Ogawa; Masatoshi Sakamoto
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.