Literature DB >> 15670991

The current concept of speed should not be used to describe digital imaging systems.

Walter Huda.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2005        PMID： 15670991     DOI： 10.1148/radiol.2342040760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN： 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Pediatric digital radiography summit overview: state of confusion.

Authors:  Steven Don
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-05

Review 2.  [Balance of required dose and image quality in digital radiography].

Authors:  M Uffmann; C Schaefer-Prokop; U Neitzel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (executive summary).

Authors:  S Jeff Shepard; Jihong Wang; Michael Flynn; Eric Gingold; Lee Goldman; Kerry Krugh; David L Leong; Eugene Mah; Kent Ogden; Donald Peck; Ehsan Samei; Jihong Wang; Charles E Willis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  [Dose reduction and adequate image quality in digital radiography: a contradiction?].

Authors:  S Pötter-Lang; M Dünkelmeyer; M Uffmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Evaluation of digital radiography practice using exposure index tracking.

Authors:  Alexander W Scott; Yifang Zhou; Janet Allahverdian; Jessica L Nute; Christina Lee
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.