Literature DB >> 26613753

Evaluation of the effects of subject thickness on the exposure index in digital radiography.

Takeshi Takaki1, Kazuki Takeda2, Seiichi Murakami3, Haruhisa Ogawa4, Masato Ogawa5, Masatoshi Sakamoto6.   

Abstract

The exposure index (EI) was proposed as a new X-ray dose index by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and has since been implemented as an international standard. The EI is calculated by use of an approximation equation under IEC-specified calibration conditions. However, several factors encountered in clinical practice, including the patient's body thickness and the tube voltage, differ with regard to these calibration conditions. We, therefore, require a solid water phantom-based function that can incorporate the IEC-specified conditions and different subject thicknesses to evaluate the effects of subject thickness on the EI. Here, we assumed average thicknesses of 10 cm for a child, 15 cm for slender patients, and 21 cm for an average adult abdomen and we evaluated errors, that are included in the EI, which were calculated by use of the function. Our results suggested that the EI depends on the subject thickness. At the 21-cm thickness (average adult abdomen), the display EI exhibited a small error level. In contrast, EI values calculated from the calibration conditions exhibited maximum errors that were as high as 34 % at the lower subject thicknesses (10 and 15 cm), suggesting a significant influence of the subject thickness on the EI. In conclusion, the EI should be used cautiously during the examination of children and thin patients, with a complete understanding of the discrepancy revealed by our study results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digital radiography; Exposure index; Pediatric radiography; Radiation dose

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26613753     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-015-0341-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  5 in total

1.  [Evaluation of calibration error for applying exposure index].

Authors:  Eiji Ariga
Journal:  Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2011

2.  The standardized exposure index for digital radiography: an opportunity for optimization of radiation dose to the pediatric population.

Authors:  J Anthony Seibert; Richard L Morin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-04-14

3.  An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (executive summary).

Authors:  S Jeff Shepard; Jihong Wang; Michael Flynn; Eric Gingold; Lee Goldman; Kerry Krugh; David L Leong; Eugene Mah; Kent Ogden; Donald Peck; Ehsan Samei; Jihong Wang; Charles E Willis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  New exposure indicators for digital radiography simplified for radiologists and technologists.

Authors:  Steven Don; Bruce R Whiting; Lois Jo Rutz; Bruce K Apgar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Digital radiography exposure indices: A review.

Authors:  Ursula Mothiram; Patrick C Brennan; Sarah J Lewis; Bernadette Moran; John Robinson
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-05-11
  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Characterization and validation of the thorax phantom Lungman for dose assessment in chest radiography optimization studies.

Authors:  Sunay Rodríguez Pérez; Nicholas William Marshall; Lara Struelens; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-02-06

2.  Method of determining technique from weight and height to achieve targeted detector exposures in portable chest and abdominal digital radiography.

Authors:  Matthew Hoerner; Kevin Grizzard; Jennifer Moroz
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.243

3.  Proper Management of the Clinical Exposure Index Based on Body Thickness Using Dose Optimization Tools in Digital Chest Radiography: A Phantom Study.

Authors:  Yongsu Yoon; Hyemin Park; Jungmin Kim; Jungsu Kim; Younghoon Roh; Nobukazu Tanaka; Junji Morishita
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.