Literature DB >> 11190947

Phototimer setup for CR imaging.

E G Christodoulou1, M M Goodsit, H P Chan, T W Hepburn.   

Abstract

A study was performed to investigate the feasibility of using the standard deviation (sigma) of the pixel values in a computed radiography (CR) image and a measure of the median incident exposure on the imaging plate (IP) as parameters for setting up phototimers in a CR system. Slabs of Lucite 4-, 6-, and 8-in.-thick were imaged with a CR system at 70, 90, and 125 kVp at various mA s values both with grid and without grid. Incident IP exposures were measured with an ionization chamber. Images were analyzed on a workstation. The sigma's in the "flat field" images were found to be approximately related to the mean incident exposure E by the relationship: sigma is proportional to E(-1/2), indicating the quantum-noise-limited operation of the system. Derived relationships between the reading sensitivity of the (IP) reader (S number) and sigma can be used to obtain images with a specific noise level. At our institution, where a 400 speed screen-film system is used for general radiography and 200 speed for chest radiography, radiologists generally find CR image quality acceptable when sigma < or = 11 (S< or =400) for general radiography (50-90 kVp), and sigma < or =8 (S< or =200) for chest radiography (125 kVp). However, factors other than the amount of x-ray quanta that form the useful image, such as the image processing mode and the amount of collimation, may affect both the sensitivity value and the image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11190947     DOI: 10.1118/1.1319522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  Optimization of dose and image quality for computed radiography and digital radiography.

Authors:  Charles E Willis
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Letter to the editor re: "Optimizing the use of computer radiography in pediatric chest imaging".

Authors:  Charles E Willis
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (executive summary).

Authors:  S Jeff Shepard; Jihong Wang; Michael Flynn; Eric Gingold; Lee Goldman; Kerry Krugh; David L Leong; Eugene Mah; Kent Ogden; Donald Peck; Ehsan Samei; Jihong Wang; Charles E Willis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Evaluation of digital radiography practice using exposure index tracking.

Authors:  Alexander W Scott; Yifang Zhou; Janet Allahverdian; Jessica L Nute; Christina Lee
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Evaluation of cassette-based digital radiography detectors using standardized image quality metrics: AAPM TG-150 Draft Image Detector Tests.

Authors:  Guang Li; Travis C Greene; Thomas K Nishino; Charles E Willis
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.