Literature DB >> 21491196

Pediatric digital radiography summit overview: state of confusion.

Steven Don1.   

Abstract

On Feb. 4, 2010, the Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Radiology held a Pediatric Digital Radiography Summit. The goal was for radiologists, radiologic technologists, medical physicists, and vendor representatives, including engineers, medical physicists and education specialists, to discuss the challenges to achieving the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle in pediatric digital radiography and to lay the groundwork for overcoming these obstacles. This article focuses on the state of confusion that exists for radiologists and radiologic technologists who use digital radiography equipment. Radiologists might have a difficult time accepting lower dose (noisy images), and radiologic technologists might respond by increasing patient exposures, which results in excessive patient doses. For reporting exposures, vendors have a history of using proprietary terms that confuse users. In addition, technical parameters cannot be easily exported for quality assurance, and there is no national standard for digital radiography. Presentations in this minisymposium focus on suggestions for the cooperative development of new technical standards, education and training to improve the quality of digital radiography in pediatric patients and promote radiation protection for children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21491196     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-010-1905-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  14 in total

1.  Mammography in the eighties.

Authors:  B J Conway; J L McCrohan; F G Rueter; O H Suleiman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  The ALARA concept in pediatric CR and DR: dose reduction in pediatric radiographic exams--a white paper conference executive summary.

Authors:  C E Willis; T L Slovis
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-10

3.  The current concept of speed should not be used to describe digital imaging systems.

Authors:  Walter Huda
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The ACR's Mammography Accreditation Program: ten years of experience since MQSA.

Authors:  Judy M Destouet; Lawrence W Bassett; Martin J Yaffe; Priscilla F Butler; Pamela A Wilcox
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Reduction of patient exposure in pediatric radiology.

Authors:  H Roehrig; E A Krupinski; R Hulett
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.

Authors:  D Brenner; C Elliston; E Hall; W Berdon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Soft-copy computed radiography in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: cost-savings analysis.

Authors:  S Don; M J Albertina; D L Ammann; R G Evens; M J Siegel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Physical aspects of photostimulable phosphor computed radiography.

Authors:  A R Cowen; A Workman; J S Price
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Radiosensitivity of children: potential for overexposure in CR and DR and magnitude of doses in ordinary radiographic examinations.

Authors:  Steven Don
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-10

Review 10.  Strategies for dose reduction in ordinary radiographic examinations using CR and DR.

Authors:  C E Willis
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-10
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Radiation use in diagnostic imaging in children: approaching the value of the pediatric radiology community.

Authors:  Donald P Frush; Erich Sorantin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-03-20

2.  Creating accountability in image quality analysis. Part 2: medical imaging accreditation.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Visual grading analysis of digital neonatal chest phantom X-ray images: Impact of detector type, dose and image processing on image quality.

Authors:  M H Smet; L Breysem; E Mussen; H Bosmans; N W Marshall; L Cockmartin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Evaluation of radiographers' knowledge and attitudes of image quality optimisation in paediatric digital radiography in Saudi Arabia and Australia: a survey-based study.

Authors:  Haney Alsleem; Rob Davidson; Bandar Al-Dhafiri; Raghad Alsleem; Hussain Ameer
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2019-11-06

5.  Electronic collimation and radiation protection in paediatric digital radiography: revival of the silver lining.

Authors:  J Bomer; L Wiersma-Deijl; H C Holscher
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2013-08-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.