Literature DB >> 19623185

Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study nutrition intervention component.

B Gillis1, C Mobley, D D Stadler, J Hartstein, A Virus, S L Volpe, L El ghormli, M A Staten, J Bridgman, S McCormick.   

Abstract

The HEALTHY study was a randomized, controlled, multicenter and middle school-based, multifaceted intervention designed to reduce risk factors for the development of type 2 diabetes. The study randomized 42 middle schools to intervention or control, and followed students from the sixth to the eighth grades. Here we describe the design of the HEALTHY nutrition intervention component that was developed to modify the total school food environment, defined to include the following: federal breakfast, lunch, after school snack and supper programs; a la carte venues, including snack bars and school stores; vending machines; fundraisers; and classroom parties and celebrations. Study staff implemented the intervention using core and toolbox strategies to achieve and maintain the following five intervention goals: (1) lower the average fat content of foods, (2) increase the availability and variety of fruits and vegetables, (3) limit the portion sizes and energy content of dessert and snack foods, (4) eliminate whole and 2% milk and all added sugar beverages, with the exception of low fat or nonfat flavored milk, and limit 100% fruit juice to breakfast in small portions and (5) increase the availability of higher fiber grain-based foods and legumes. Other nutrition intervention component elements were taste tests, cafeteria enhancements, cafeteria line messages and other messages about healthy eating, cafeteria learning laboratory (CLL) activities, twice-yearly training of food service staff, weekly meetings with food service managers, incentives for food service departments, and twice yearly local meetings and three national summits with district food service directors. Strengths of the intervention design were the integration of nutrition with the other HEALTHY intervention components (physical education, behavior change and communications), and the collaboration and rapport between the nutrition intervention study staff members and food service personnel at both school and district levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19623185      PMCID: PMC2754734          DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2009.114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)        ISSN: 0307-0565            Impact factor:   5.095


  26 in total

Review 1.  Dietary carbohydrate (amount and type) in the prevention and management of diabetes: a statement by the american diabetes association.

Authors:  Nancy F Sheard; Nathaniel G Clark; Janette C Brand-Miller; Marion J Franz; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Elizabeth Mayer-Davis; Karmeen Kulkarni; Patti Geil
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  School-based approaches to affect adolescents' diets: results from the TEENS study.

Authors:  Leslie A Lytle; David M Murray; Cheryl L Perry; Mary Story; Amanda S Birnbaum; Martha Y Kubik; Sherri Varnell
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2004-04

3.  Competitive foods increase the intake of energy and decrease the intake of certain nutrients by adolescents consuming school lunch.

Authors:  Susan B Templeton; Martha A Marlette; Myna Panemangalore
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2005-02

Review 4.  Healthy nutrition environments: concepts and measures.

Authors:  Karen Glanz; James F Sallis; Brian E Saelens; Lawrence D Frank
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2005 May-Jun

5.  Texas school food policy changes related to middle school a la carte/snack bar foods: potential savings in kilocalories.

Authors:  Karen Weber Cullen; Debbe I Thompson
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2005-12

6.  The contribution of expanding portion sizes to the US obesity epidemic.

Authors:  Lisa R Young; Marion Nestle
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Social marketing-based communications to integrate and support the HEALTHY study intervention.

Authors:  L L DeBar; M Schneider; E G Ford; A E Hernandez; B Showell; K L Drews; E L Moe; B Gillis; A N Jessup; D D Stadler; M White
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.095

8.  Environmental interventions for eating and physical activity: a randomized controlled trial in middle schools.

Authors:  James F Sallis; Thomas L McKenzie; Terry L Conway; John P Elder; Judith J Prochaska; Marianne Brown; Michelle M Zive; Simon J Marshall; John E Alcaraz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 9.  Cereal grains, legumes and diabetes.

Authors:  B J Venn; J I Mann
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 10.  Dietary fat, insulin sensitivity and the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  G Riccardi; R Giacco; A A Rivellese
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.324

View more
  32 in total

1.  Process evaluation results from the HEALTHY physical education intervention.

Authors:  William J Hall; Abigail Zeveloff; Allan Steckler; Margaret Schneider; Deborah Thompson; Trang Pham; Stella L Volpe; Katie Hindes; Adriana Sleigh; Robert G McMurray
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2011-12-08

2.  Process evaluation results from the HEALTHY nutrition intervention to modify the total school food environment.

Authors:  S L Volpe; W J Hall; A Steckler; M Schneider; D Thompson; C Mobley; T Pham; L El ghormli
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2013-10-08

3.  Impact of implementation and conduct of the HEALTHY primary prevention trial on student performance.

Authors:  Arthur E Hernandez; Marsha D Marcus; Kathryn Hirst; Myles S Faith; Linn Goldberg; Roberto P Treviño
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2013-11-07

4.  Effect of relative weight group change on nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy derived lipoprotein particle size and concentrations among adolescents.

Authors:  Russell Jago; Kimberly L Drews; James D Otvos; Gary D Foster; Marsha D Marcus; John B Buse; Michele Mietus-Snyder; Steven M Willi
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 5.  Lessons learned from the HEALTHY primary prevention trial of risk factors for type 2 diabetes in middle school youth.

Authors:  Marsha D Marcus; Kathryn Hirst; Francine Kaufman; Gary D Foster; Tom Baranowski
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.810

6.  Rationale, design and methods for process evaluation in the HEALTHY study.

Authors:  M Schneider; W J Hall; A E Hernandez; K Hindes; G Montez; T Pham; L Rosen; A Sleigh; D Thompson; S L Volpe; A Zeveloff; A Steckler
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.095

7.  HEALTHY study rationale, design and methods: moderating risk of type 2 diabetes in multi-ethnic middle school students.

Authors:  Kathryn Hirst; Tom Baranowski; Lynn DeBar; Gary D Foster; Francine Kaufman; Phyllis Kennel; Barbara Linder; Margaret Schneider; Elizabeth M Venditti; Zenong Yin
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.095

8.  Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study physical education intervention component.

Authors:  R G McMurray; S Bassin; R Jago; S Bruecker; E L Moe; T Murray; S L Mazzuto; S L Volpe
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.095

9.  Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study behavior intervention component.

Authors:  E M Venditti; D L Elliot; M S Faith; L S Firrell; C M Giles; L Goldberg; M D Marcus; M Schneider; S Solomon; D Thompson; Z Yin
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  Social marketing-based communications to integrate and support the HEALTHY study intervention.

Authors:  L L DeBar; M Schneider; E G Ford; A E Hernandez; B Showell; K L Drews; E L Moe; B Gillis; A N Jessup; D D Stadler; M White
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.095

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.