Literature DB >> 19623191

Rationale, design and methods for process evaluation in the HEALTHY study.

M Schneider1, W J Hall, A E Hernandez, K Hindes, G Montez, T Pham, L Rosen, A Sleigh, D Thompson, S L Volpe, A Zeveloff, A Steckler.   

Abstract

The HEALTHY study was a multi-site randomized trial designed to determine whether a 3-year school-based intervention targeting nutrition and physical activity behaviors could effectively reduce risk factors associated with type 2 diabetes in middle school children. Pilot and formative studies were conducted to inform the development of the intervention components and the process evaluation methods for the main trial. During the main trial, both qualitative and quantitative assessments monitored the fidelity of the intervention and motivated modifications to improve intervention delivery. Structured observations of physical education classes, total school food environments, classroom-based educational modules, and communications and promotional campaigns provided verification that the intervention was delivered as intended. Interviews and focus groups yielded a multidimensional assessment of how the intervention was delivered and received, as well as identifying the barriers to and facilitators of the intervention across and within participating schools. Interim summaries of process evaluation data were presented to the study group as a means of ensuring standardization and quality of the intervention across the seven participating centers. Process evaluation methods and procedures documented the fidelity with which the HEALTHY study was implemented across 21 intervention schools and identified ways in which the intervention delivery might be enhanced throughout the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19623191      PMCID: PMC2749285          DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2009.118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)        ISSN: 0307-0565            Impact factor:   5.095


  18 in total

1.  How best to measure implementation of school health curricula: a comparison of three measures.

Authors:  K Resnicow; M Davis; M Smith; A Lazarus-Yaroch; T Baranowski; J Baranowski; C Doyle; D T Wang
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  1998-06

Review 2.  Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide.

Authors:  Ruth P Saunders; Martin H Evans; Praphul Joshi
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2005-04

3.  Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research.

Authors:  Sam Porter
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Quality in qualitative research.

Authors:  Simon C Kitto; Janice Chesters; Carol Grbich
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2008-02-18       Impact factor: 7.738

5.  Improving the reporting of public health intervention research: advancing TREND and CONSORT.

Authors:  Rebecca Armstrong; Elizabeth Waters; Laurence Moore; Elisha Riggs; Luis Gabriel Cuervo; Pisake Lumbiganon; Penelope Hawe
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 2.341

6.  The quality of qualitative research.

Authors:  Dave S Collingridge; Edwin E Gantt
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Factors influencing teachers' implementation of an innovative tobacco prevention curriculum for multiethnic youth: Project SPLASH.

Authors:  Angela Sy; Karen Glanz
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.118

8.  The development, implementation, and process evaluation of the REACH Detroit Partnership's Diabetes Lifestyle Intervention.

Authors:  Jacqueline Two Feathers; Edith C Kieffer; Gloria Palmisano; Mike Anderson; Nancy Janz; Michael S Spencer; Ricardo Guzman; Sherman A James
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.140

9.  Social marketing-based communications to integrate and support the HEALTHY study intervention.

Authors:  L L DeBar; M Schneider; E G Ford; A E Hernandez; B Showell; K L Drews; E L Moe; B Gillis; A N Jessup; D D Stadler; M White
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 10.  Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions.

Authors:  Ann Oakley; Vicki Strange; Chris Bonell; Elizabeth Allen; Judith Stephenson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-18
View more
  38 in total

1.  Process evaluation results from the HEALTHY physical education intervention.

Authors:  William J Hall; Abigail Zeveloff; Allan Steckler; Margaret Schneider; Deborah Thompson; Trang Pham; Stella L Volpe; Katie Hindes; Adriana Sleigh; Robert G McMurray
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2011-12-08

2.  Process evaluation results from the HEALTHY nutrition intervention to modify the total school food environment.

Authors:  S L Volpe; W J Hall; A Steckler; M Schneider; D Thompson; C Mobley; T Pham; L El ghormli
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2013-10-08

3.  Impact of implementation and conduct of the HEALTHY primary prevention trial on student performance.

Authors:  Arthur E Hernandez; Marsha D Marcus; Kathryn Hirst; Myles S Faith; Linn Goldberg; Roberto P Treviño
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2013-11-07

4.  Childhood Obesity Research Demonstration project: cross-site evaluation methods.

Authors:  Daniel P O'Connor; Rebecca E Lee; Paras Mehta; Debbe Thompson; Alok Bhargava; Coleen Carlson; Dennis Kao; Charles S Layne; Tracey Ledoux; Teresia O'Connor; Hanadi Rifai; Lauren Gulley; Allen M Hallett; Ousswa Kudia; Sitara Joseph; Maria Modelska; Dana Ortega; Nathan Parker; Andria Stevens
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.992

5.  A classroom-based physical activity intervention for urban kindergarten and first-grade students: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Marina Reznik; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Mimi Kim; Philip O Ozuah
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.992

6.  Using a systematic conceptual model for a process evaluation of a middle school obesity risk-reduction nutrition curriculum intervention: choice, control & change.

Authors:  Heewon Lee; Isobel R Contento; Pamela Koch
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.045

Review 7.  School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.

Authors:  Maureen Dobbins; Heather Husson; Kara DeCorby; Rebecca L LaRocca
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

Review 8.  Lessons learned from the HEALTHY primary prevention trial of risk factors for type 2 diabetes in middle school youth.

Authors:  Marsha D Marcus; Kathryn Hirst; Francine Kaufman; Gary D Foster; Tom Baranowski
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.810

9.  HEALTHY study rationale, design and methods: moderating risk of type 2 diabetes in multi-ethnic middle school students.

Authors:  Kathryn Hirst; Tom Baranowski; Lynn DeBar; Gary D Foster; Francine Kaufman; Phyllis Kennel; Barbara Linder; Margaret Schneider; Elizabeth M Venditti; Zenong Yin
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  Using process evaluation for program improvement in dose, fidelity and reach: the ACT trial experience.

Authors:  Dawn K Wilson; Sarah Griffin; Ruth P Saunders; Heather Kitzman-Ulrich; Duncan C Meyers; Leslie Mansard
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.