Literature DB >> 19378745

Design of optimal collimation for dedicated molecular breast imaging systems.

Amanda L Weinmann1, Carrie B Hruska, Michael K O'Connor.   

Abstract

Molecular breast imaging (MBI) is a functional imaging technique that uses specialized small field-of-view gamma cameras to detect the preferential uptake of a radiotracer in breast lesions. MBI has potential to be a useful adjunct method to screening mammography for the detection of occult breast cancer. However, a current limitation of MBI is the high radiation dose (a factor of 7-10 times that of screening mammography) associated with current technology. The purpose of this study was to optimize the gamma camera collimation with the aim of improving sensitivity while retaining adequate resolution for the detection of sub-10-mm lesions. Square-hole collimators with holes matched to the pixilated cadmium zinc telluride detector elements of the MBI system were designed. Data from MBI patient studies and parameters of existing dual-head MBI systems were used to guide the range of desired collimator resolutions, source-to-collimator distances, pixel sizes, and collimator materials that were examined. General equations describing collimator performance for a conventional gamma camera were used in the design process along with several important adjustments to account for the specialized imaging geometry of the MBI system. Both theoretical calculations and a Monte Carlo model were used to measure the geometric efficiency (or sensitivity) and resolution of each designed collimator. Results showed that through optimal collimation, collimator sensitivity could be improved by factors of 1.5-3.2, while maintaining a collimator resolution of either < or =5 or < or = 7.5 mm at a distance of 3 cm from the collimator face. These gains in collimator sensitivity permit an inversely proportional drop in the required dose to perform

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19378745      PMCID: PMC2736746          DOI: 10.1118/1.3077119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  20 in total

1.  Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Helen Guo; Lisa J Martin; Limei Sun; Jennifer Stone; Eve Fishell; Roberta A Jong; Greg Hislop; Anna Chiarelli; Salomon Minkin; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Molecular breast imaging: advantages and limitations of a scintimammographic technique in patients with small breast tumors.

Authors:  Michael K O'Connor; Stephen W Phillips; Carrie B Hruska; Deborah J Rhodes; Douglas A Collins
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  High-resolution scintimammography improves the accuracy of technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile scintimammography: use of a new dedicated gamma camera.

Authors:  F Scopinaro; R Pani; G De Vincentis; A Soluri; R Pellegrini; L M Porfiri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-10

4.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Diana L Miglioretti; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Karla Kerlikowske; Robert Rosenberg; Carolyn M Rutter; Berta M Geller; Linn A Abraham; Steven H Taplin; Mark Dignan; Gary Cutter; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Quantification of lesion size, depth, and uptake using a dual-head molecular breast imaging system.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct imaging modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Rachel F Brem; Angelique C Floerke; Jocelyn A Rapelyea; Christine Teal; Tricia Kelly; Vivek Mathur
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.

Authors:  Thomas M Kolb; Jacob Lichy; Jeffrey H Newhouse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Scintimammography with dedicated breast camera in unifocal and multifocal/multicentric primary breast cancer detection: a comparative study with SPECT.

Authors:  Angela Spanu; Pierina Cottu; Alessandra Manca; Francesca Chessa; Daniela Sanna; Giuseppe Madeddu
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.650

10.  Molecular breast imaging: use of a dual-head dedicated gamma camera to detect small breast tumors.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Stephen W Phillips; Dana H Whaley; Deborah J Rhodes; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  17 in total

1.  Simulation study comparing high-purity germanium and cadmium zinc telluride detectors for breast imaging.

Authors:  D L Campbell; T E Peterson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Review of SPECT collimator selection, optimization, and fabrication for clinical and preclinical imaging.

Authors:  Karen Van Audenhaege; Roel Van Holen; Stefaan Vandenberghe; Christian Vanhove; Scott D Metzler; Stephen C Moore
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Lexicon for standardized interpretation of gamma camera molecular breast imaging: observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Amy Lynn Conners; Carrie B Hruska; Cindy L Tortorelli; Robert W Maxwell; Deborah J Rhodes; Judy C Boughey; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Nuclear imaging of the breast: translating achievements in instrumentation into clinical use.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Collimator design for a dedicated molecular breast imaging-guided biopsy system: proof-of-concept.

Authors:  Amanda L Weinmann; Carrie B Hruska; Amy L Conners; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Comparison of breast specific gamma imaging and molecular breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection: Evaluation in phantoms.

Authors:  Zongyi Gong; Mark B Williams
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Observer detection limits for a dedicated SPECT breast imaging system.

Authors:  S J Cutler; K L Perez; H X Barnhart; M P Tornai
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Journal club: molecular breast imaging at reduced radiation dose for supplemental screening in mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  Deborah J Rhodes; Carrie B Hruska; Amy Lynn Conners; Cindy L Tortorelli; Robert W Maxwell; Katie N Jones; Alicia Y Toledano; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  An energy-optimized collimator design for a CZT-based SPECT camera.

Authors:  Fenghua Weng; Srijeeta Bagchi; Yunlong Zan; Qiu Huang; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 1.455

10.  Molecular Breast Imaging using Synthetic Projections from High-Purity Germanium Detectors: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Desmond Campbell; Todd Peterson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.