Literature DB >> 12558355

Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.

Patricia A Carney1, Diana L Miglioretti, Bonnie C Yankaskas, Karla Kerlikowske, Robert Rosenberg, Carolyn M Rutter, Berta M Geller, Linn A Abraham, Steven H Taplin, Mark Dignan, Gary Cutter, Rachel Ballard-Barbash.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationships among breast density, age, and use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in breast cancer detection have not been fully evaluated.
OBJECTIVE: To determine how breast density, age, and use of HRT individually and in combination affect the accuracy of screening mammography.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: 7 population-based mammography registries in North Carolina; New Mexico; New Hampshire; Vermont; Colorado; Seattle, Washington; and San Francisco, California. PARTICIPANTS: 329 495 women 40 to 89 years of age who had 463 372 screening mammograms from 1996 to 1998; 2223 women received a diagnosis of breast cancer. MEASUREMENTS: Breast density, age, HRT use, rate of breast cancer occurrence, and sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography.
RESULTS: Adjusted sensitivity ranged from 62.9% in women with extremely dense breasts to 87.0% in women with almost entirely fatty breasts; adjusted sensitivity increased with age from 68.6% in women 40 to 44 years of age to 83.3% in women 80 to 89 years of age. Adjusted specificity increased from 89.1% in women with extremely dense breasts to 96.9% in women with almost entirely fatty breasts. In women who did not use HRT, adjusted specificity increased from 91.4% in women 40 to 44 years of age to 94.4% in women 80 to 89 years of age. In women who used HRT, adjusted specificity was about 91.7% for all ages.
CONCLUSIONS: Mammographic breast density and age are important predictors of the accuracy of screening mammography. Although HRT use is not an independent predictor of accuracy, it probably affects accuracy by increasing breast density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12558355     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  291 in total

1.  Radiologists' attitudes and use of mammography audit reports.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Berta Geller; Natalia Vukshich Oster; Patricia A Carney; Diana L Miglioretti; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Edward A Sickles; Tracy Onega; Robert D Rosenberg; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Molecular imaging using light-absorbing imaging agents and a clinical optical breast imaging system--a phantom study.

Authors:  Stephanie M W Y van de Ven; Niculae Mincu; Jean Brunette; Guobin Ma; Mario Khayat; Debra M Ikeda; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  US-guided diffuse optical tomography for breast lesions: the reliability of clinical experience.

Authors:  Min Jung Kim; Ji Youn Kim; Jung Hyun Youn; Myung Hyun Kim; Hye Ryoung Koo; Soo Jin Kim; Yu-Mee Sohn; Hee Jung Moon; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Revisiting the clinical validity of multiplex genetic testing in complex diseases.

Authors:  A Cecile J W Janssens; M Carolina Pardo; Ewout W Steyerberg; Cornelia M van Duijn
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Automatic classification of mammography reports by BI-RADS breast tissue composition class.

Authors:  Bethany Percha; Houssam Nassif; Jafi Lipson; Elizabeth Burnside; Daniel Rubin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Diagnosing breast masses in digital mammography using feature selection and ensemble methods.

Authors:  Shu-Ting Luo; Bor-Wen Cheng
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Dual-modality breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Mark B Williams; Patricia G Judy; Spencer Gunn; Stanislaw Majewski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Photoacoustic angiography of the breast.

Authors:  Robert A Kruger; Richard B Lam; Daniel R Reinecke; Stephen P Del Rio; Ryan P Doyle
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Direct Regularization From Co-Registered Contrast MRI Improves Image Quality of MRI-Guided Near-Infrared Spectral Tomography of Breast Lesions.

Authors:  Limin Zhang; Shudong Jiang; Yan Zhao; Jinchao Feng; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Adaptable near-infrared spectroscopy fiber array for improved coupling to different breast sizes during clinical MRI.

Authors:  Michael A Mastanduno; Fadi El-Ghussein; Shudong Jiang; Roberta Diflorio-Alexander; Xu Junqing; Yin Hong; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.