Literature DB >> 18487533

Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct imaging modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Rachel F Brem1, Angelique C Floerke, Jocelyn A Rapelyea, Christine Teal, Tricia Kelly, Vivek Mathur.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the sensitivity and specificity of breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) for the detection of breast cancer by using pathologic results as the reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was Institutional Review Board approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant. Informed consent was obtained for participants who were not imaged as part of their clinical protocol but were participating in other Institutional Review Board-approved studies that used BSGI. A retrospective review of 146 women (aged 32-98 years) undergoing BSGI and breast biopsy was performed. Patients underwent BSGI with intravenous injection of 30 mCi (1110 MBq) of technetium 99 ((99m)Tc)-sestamibi and were imaged in craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique projections. Study images were assigned scores, and scores were classified as positive (focal increased radiotracer uptake) or negative (no uptake or scattered heterogeneous physiologic uptake) and compared with biopsy results. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were determined.
RESULTS: In 146 patients, 167 lesions underwent biopsy, of which 83 (16 ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS] and 67 invasive cancers) were malignant. Of 84 nonmalignant lesions, 82 were benign and two showed atypical histologic results (one atypical lobular hyperplasia and one lobular carcinoma in situ). BSGI helped detect cancer in 80 of 83 malignant lesions with a sensitivity of 96.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92%, 99%) and correctly identified 50 of 84 nonmalignant lesions as negative for cancer with a specificity of 59.5% (95% CI: 49%, 70%). The positive predictive value for 80 of 114 malignant lesions with a BSGI examination with findings positive for cancer was 68.8% (95% CI: 60%, 78%) and the negative predictive value for 50 of 53 nonmalignant lesions was 94.3% (95% CI: 88%, 99%). The smallest invasive cancer and DCIS detected were both 1 mm. BSGI helped detect occult cancer not visualized at mammography or ultrasonography in six patients.
CONCLUSION: BSIG has high sensitivity (96.4%) and moderate specificity (59.5%) helping detect breast cancers. (c) RSNA, 2008.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18487533     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2473061678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  32 in total

1.  Investigating the limit of detectability of a positron emission mammography device: a phantom study.

Authors:  Nicholas A Shkumat; Adam Springer; Christopher M Walker; Eric M Rohren; Wei T Yang; Beatriz E Adrada; Elsa Arribas; Selin Carkaci; Hubert H Chuang; Lumarie Santiago; Osama R Mawlawi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  [Functional and molecular imaging of breast tumors].

Authors:  K Pinker; P Brader; G Karanikas; K El-Rabadi; W Bogner; S Gruber; M Reisegger; S Trattnig; T H Helbich
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Design of optimal collimation for dedicated molecular breast imaging systems.

Authors:  Amanda L Weinmann; Carrie B Hruska; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer - Potential Future Aspects.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Wolfgang Bogner; Stephan Gruber; Peter Brader; Siegfried Trattnig; Georgios Karanikas; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Characterizing the contribution of cardiac and hepatic uptake in dedicated breast SPECT using tilted trajectories.

Authors:  K L Perez; S J Cutler; P Madhav; M P Tornai
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Zongyi Gong; Kelly Klanian; Tushita Patel; Olivia Sullivan; Mark B Williams
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Nuclear imaging of the breast: translating achievements in instrumentation into clinical use.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  [Molecular breast imaging. An update].

Authors:  K Pinker; T H Helbich; H Magometschnigg; B Fueger; P Baltzer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Breast imaging: A survey.

Authors:  Subbhuraam Vinitha Sree; Eddie Yin-Kwee Ng; Rajendra U Acharya; Oliver Faust
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-10

Review 10.  Clinical usefulness of breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct modality to mammography for diagnosis of breast cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Wei Wei; Hua-Wei Yang; Jian-Lun Liu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.