Literature DB >> 23635248

Nuclear imaging of the breast: translating achievements in instrumentation into clinical use.

Carrie B Hruska1, Michael K O'Connor.   

Abstract

Approaches to imaging the breast with nuclear medicine and∕or molecular imaging methods have been under investigation since the late 1980s when a technique called scintimammography was first introduced. This review charts the progress of nuclear imaging of the breast over the last 20 years, covering the development of newer techniques such as breast specific gamma imaging, molecular breast imaging, and positron emission mammography. Key issues critical to the adoption of these technologies in the clinical environment are discussed, including the current status of clinical studies, the efforts at reducing the radiation dose from procedures associated with these technologies, and the relevant radiopharmaceuticals that are available or under development. The necessary steps required to move these technologies from bench to bedside are also discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23635248      PMCID: PMC3656956          DOI: 10.1118/1.4802733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  171 in total

1.  Technique to obtain positron emission mammography images in registration with x-ray mammograms.

Authors:  A M Bergman; C J Thompson; K Murthy; J L Robar; R L Clancy; M J English
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Comparison of radiation exposure and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from mammography and molecular imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Michael K O'Connor; Hua Li; Deborah J Rhodes; Carrie B Hruska; Conor B Clancy; Richard J Vetter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Design and evaluation of the MAMMI dedicated breast PET.

Authors:  L Moliner; A J Gonzalez; A Soriano; F Sanchez; C Correcher; A Orero; M Carles; L F Vidal; J Barbera; L Caballero; M Seimetz; C Vazquez; J M Benlloch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The System Design, Engineering Architecture, and Preliminary Results of a Lower-Cost High-Sensitivity High-Resolution Positron Emission Mammography Camera.

Authors:  Yuxuan Zhang; Rocio A Ramirez; Hongdi Li; Shitao Liu; Shaohui An; Chao Wang; Hossain Baghaei; Wai-Hoi Wong
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 1.679

5.  MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary breast cancer studied in IBMC 6883.

Authors:  Mitchell D Schnall; Jeffery Blume; David A Bluemke; Gia A Deangelis; Nanette Debruhl; Steven Harms; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Nola Hylton; Christiane K Kuhl; Etta D Pisano; Petrina Causer; Stuart J Schnitt; Stanley F Smazal; Carol B Stelling; Constance Lehman; Paul T Weatherall; Constantine A Gatsonis
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  99mTc-(V)DMSA scintimammography in the assessment of breast lesions: comparative study with 99mTc-MIBI.

Authors:  V Papantoniou; J Christodoulidou; E Papadaki; V Valotassiou; A Stipsanelli; A Louvrou; D Lazaris; M Sotiropoulou; G Pampouras; A Keramopoulos; S Michalas; C Zerva
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-07

7.  Initial clinical test of a breast-PET scanner.

Authors:  Raymond R Raylman; Jame Abraham; Hannah Hazard; Courtney Koren; Shannon Filburn; Judith S Schreiman; Sobha Kurian; Stan Majewski; Gary D Marano
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.735

Review 8.  The role of (99m)Tc methoxyisobutylisonitrile in imaging breast cancer.

Authors:  A D Waxman
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.446

9.  Is mammography adequate for screening women with inherited BRCA mutations and low breast density?

Authors:  Rachel Z Bigenwald; Ellen Warner; Anoma Gunasekara; Kimberley A Hill; Petrina A Causer; Sandra J Messner; Andrea Eisen; Donald B Plewes; Steven A Narod; Liying Zhang; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Constantine Gatsonis; Christiane K Kuhl; R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Lucy Hanna; Sue Peacock; Stanley F Smazal; Daniel D Maki; Thomas B Julian; Elizabeth R DePeri; David A Bluemke; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  7 in total

1.  Non-rigid registration of serial dedicated breast CT, longitudinal dedicated breast CT and PET/CT images using the diffeomorphic demons method.

Authors:  Jonathan Santos; Abhijit J Chaudhari; Anand A Joshi; Andrea Ferrero; Kai Yang; John M Boone; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.685

2.  A hardware investigation of robotic SPECT for functional and molecular imaging onboard radiation therapy systems.

Authors:  Susu Yan; James Bowsher; MengHeng Tough; Lin Cheng; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Added value of semi-quantitative breast-specific gamma imaging in the work-up of suspicious breast lesions compared to mammography, ultrasound and 3-T MRI.

Authors:  T Meissnitzer; A Seymer; P Keinrath; J Holzmannhofer; C Pirich; K Hergan; M W Meissnitzer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Dedicated Breast Gamma Camera Imaging and Breast PET: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Deepa Narayanan; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2018-07

Review 5.  Methodological aspects of 99mTc-sestamibi guided biopsy in breast cancer.

Authors:  A Collarino; R A Valdés Olmos; A F van der Hoeven; L M Pereira Arias-Bouda
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2016-07-16

6.  Evaluation of a High-Sensitivity Organ-Targeted PET Camera.

Authors:  Justin Stiles; Brandon Baldassi; Oleksandr Bubon; Harutyun Poladyan; Vivianne Freitas; Anabel Scaranelo; Anna Marie Mulligan; Michael Waterston; Alla Reznik
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Direct-Conversion Molecular Breast Imaging of Invasive Breast Cancer: Imaging Features, Extent of Invasive Disease, and Comparison Between Invasive Ductal and Lobular Histology.

Authors:  Amy Lynn Conners; Katie N Jones; Carrie B Hruska; Jennifer R Geske; Judy C Boughey; Deborah J Rhodes
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.959

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.