Literature DB >> 1933582

Precision and stability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements.

J Johnson1, B Dawson-Hughes.   

Abstract

This study was performed to determine the precision and stability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) measurements, to compare bone mineral density (BMD) of subjects measured by DEXA and radionuclide dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA), and to evaluate different absorber materials for use with an external standard. Short-term precision (% coefficient of variation, CV) was determined in 6 subjects scanned six times each with repositioning, initially and 9 months later. Mean CV was 1.04% for spine and 2.13% for femoral neck BMD; for whole-body measurements in 5 subjects, mean CV was 0.64% for BMD, 2.2% for fat, and 1.05% for lean body mass. Precision of aluminum phantom measurements made over a 9-month period was 0.89% with the phantom in 15.2 cm, 0.88% in 20.3 cm, and 1.42% in 27.9 cm of water. In 51 subjects, BMD by DEXA and DPA was correlated for the spine (r = 0.98, P = 0.000) and femoral neck (r = 0.91, P = 0.000). Spine BMD was 4.5% lower and femoral neck BMD 3.1% higher by DEXA than by DPA. An aluminum phantom was scanned repeatedly, in both water and in an oil/water (30:70) mixture at thickness ranging from 15.2 through 27.9 cm. Phantom BMD was lower at 15.2 cm than at higher thicknesses of both water and oil/water (P = 0.05, ANOVA). The phantom was scanned repeatedly in 15.2, 20.3, and 27.9 cm of water over a 9 month period. In 15.2 and 20.3 cm of water, phantom BMD did not vary significantly whereas in 27.9 cm of water (equivalent to a human over 30 cm thick), phantom BMD increased 2.3% (P = 0.01) over the 9 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1933582     DOI: 10.1007/bf02556113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  12 in total

1.  Precision error in dual-photon absorptiometry related to source age.

Authors:  P D Ross; R D Wasnich; J M Vogel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Measurement of bone by dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

Authors:  R B Mazess; H S Barden
Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol       Date:  1988

3.  A comparison of quantitative dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  L Strause; M Bracker; P Saltman; D Sartoris; E Kerr
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Dual energy radiography (DER): a preliminary comparative study.

Authors:  R Pacifici; R Rupich; I Vered; K C Fischer; M Griffin; N Susman; L V Avioli
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  H W Wahner; W L Dunn; M L Brown; R L Morin; B L Riggs
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Correction of the effects of source, source strength, and soft-tissue thickness on spine dual-photon absorptiometry measurements.

Authors:  B Dawson-Hughes; M S Deehr; P S Berger; G E Dallal; L J Sadowski
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Dual-photon absorptiometry: comparison of bone mineral and soft tissue mass measurements in vivo with established methods.

Authors:  S B Heymsfield; J Wang; S Heshka; J J Kehayias; R N Pierson
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  T L Kelly; D M Slovik; D A Schoenfeld; R M Neer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  X-ray dual-photon absorptiometry: a new method for the measurement of bone density.

Authors:  I D Cullum; P J Ell; J P Ryder
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Long-term precision of dual photon absorptiometry in the lumbar spine in clinical settings.

Authors:  L Nilas; C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1988-03
View more
  44 in total

1.  Dietary supplements and physical exercise affecting bone and body composition in frail elderly persons.

Authors:  N de Jong; M J Chin A Paw; L C de Groot; G J Hiddink; W A van Staveren
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Enhanced precision with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  R Mazess; C H Chesnut; M McClung; H Genant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Comparative assessment of bone mineral density of the forearm using single photon and dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J W Nieves; F Cosman; C Mars; R Lindsay
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  Population screening for osteoporosis to prevent fractures.

Authors:  T A Sheldon; N Freemantle; S Ibbotson; C Pollock; J Mason; A F Long
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-03

5.  Increased risk of tooth loss is related to bone loss at the whole body, hip, and spine.

Authors:  E A Krall; R I Garcia; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  The influence of exogenous fat and water on lumbar spine bone mineral density in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Kyu-Nam Kim; Bom-Taeck Kim; Kwang-Min Kim; Sat-Byul Park; Nam-Seok Joo; Sang Hyeon Je; Young-Sang Kim; Duck-Joo Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  The effects of standardization and reference values on patient classification for spine and femur dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  A Simmons; D E Simpson; M J O'Doherty; S Barrington; A J Coakley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry underestimates in vivo lumbar spine bone mineral density in overweight rats.

Authors:  Rim Cherif; Laurence Vico; Norbert Laroche; Mohsen Sakly; Nebil Attia; Cedric Lavet
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Reference data for bone density and body composition measured with dual energy x ray absorptiometry in white children and young adults.

Authors:  I M van der Sluis; M A J de Ridder; A M Boot; E P Krenning; S M P F de Muinck Keizer-Schrama
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Rheumatoid cachexia: cytokine-driven hypermetabolism accompanying reduced body cell mass in chronic inflammation.

Authors:  R Roubenoff; R A Roubenoff; J G Cannon; J J Kehayias; H Zhuang; B Dawson-Hughes; C A Dinarello; I H Rosenberg
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.