Literature DB >> 3141022

Dual energy radiography (DER): a preliminary comparative study.

R Pacifici1, R Rupich, I Vered, K C Fischer, M Griffin, N Susman, L V Avioli.   

Abstract

Dual energy radiography (DER) has been recently proposed as a new technique for the non invasive measurement of vertebral mineral density. This preliminary study was undertaken to assess the short-term precision of DER and to compare DER to dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) measurements. Three DER measurements were obtained in 19 healthy volunteers (mean age 34.7 +/- 9.3 years) over a 3 week period. In addition, both DER and DPA measurements were obtained in 52 women (mean age 54.3 +/- 12.5 years). The coefficient of variation for the DER measurements was 1.00%. A highly significant correlation (r = 0.94; p less than 0.0001) was found between DPA and DER. Using this curve a conversion factor of -6.8% was calculated to convert DER to DPA values. Both DER and DPA were significantly and similarly correlated with age (r = -0.43, p less than 0.005; r = -0.38, p less than 0.05, respectively). The rates of bone loss, 0.66% per year for DER and 0.57% per year for DPA, were also similar with the two techniques. From these data, it is concluded that DER is a precise new method for vertebral bone mass measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3141022     DOI: 10.1007/bf02571319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  9 in total

1.  Longitudinal changes in bone mass after one year as measured by different techniques in patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  S M Ott; R F Kilcoyne; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Vertebral and total body bone mineral content by dual photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  M Madsen; W Peppler; R B Mazess
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Res       Date:  1976-08

Review 3.  Quantitative computed tomography: update 1987.

Authors:  H K Genant; P Steiger; J E Block; C C Glueer; B Ettinger; S T Harris
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Dichromatic absorptiometry of vertebral bone mineral content.

Authors:  C R Wilson; M Madsen
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Dual-photon Gd-153 absorptiometry of bone.

Authors:  H W Wahner; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; M Towsley; R Lindsay; L Markhard; D Dempster
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Quantitative computed tomography for spinal density measurement. Factors affecting precision.

Authors:  D I Rosenthal; M A Ganott; G Wyshak; D M Slovik; S H Doppelt; R M Neer
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. Differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes.

Authors:  B L Riggs; H W Wahner; E Seeman; K P Offord; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; K A Johnson; L J Melton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Total body bone mineral and lean body mass by dual-photon absorptiometry. I. Theory and measurement procedure.

Authors:  W W Peppler; R B Mazess
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Quantitative computed tomography for prediction of vertebral fracture risk.

Authors:  C E Cann; H K Genant; F O Kolb; B Ettinger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.398

  9 in total
  27 in total

1.  Comparative study of the performances of X-ray and gadolinium 153 bone densitometers at the level of the spine, femoral neck and femoral shaft.

Authors:  D O Slosman; R Rizzoli; B Buchs; F Piana; A Donath; J P Bonjour
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

2.  In vitro comparability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone densitometers.

Authors:  M L Rencken; R Murano; B L Drinkwater; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  An evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and comparison with dual-photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  B Lees; J C Stevenson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Bone imaging: traditional techniques and their interpretation.

Authors:  Holger F Boehm; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  The determination of bone fracture properties by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and single-photon absorptiometry: a comparative study.

Authors:  M D Markel; M A Wikenheiser; R L Morin; D G Lewallen; E Y Chao
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  In vivo and in vitro precision for bone density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorption.

Authors:  J Lilley; B G Walters; D A Heath; Z Drolc
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Precision and stability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements.

Authors:  J Johnson; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 8.  Impact of bone mineral measurements on osteoporosis.

Authors:  I Fogelman; A Rodin; G Blake
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

Review 9.  Measurement of bone mineral density.

Authors:  C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  A population-based comparison of quantitative dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine and hip.

Authors:  T L Holbrook; E Barrett-Connor; M Klauber; D Sartoris
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.