Literature DB >> 2509017

A comparison of quantitative dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine in postmenopausal women.

L Strause1, M Bracker, P Saltman, D Sartoris, E Kerr.   

Abstract

Noninvasive bone densitometry is an important aspect in the detection and management of osteoporosis and other forms of metabolic disease of calcified tissue. A system using quantitative dual-energy digital projection radiography (QDR) of the lumbar spine was systematically tested against dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) of the lumbar spine in 131 women over 55 years of age and free from major risk factors for osteoporosis. All subjects were scanned by both QDR and DPA under the same conditions. Measurements for a given subject were made within 15 minutes of each other. Bone mineral densities (BMD) were determined for four individual levels in the lumbar spine (L1-L4). Regression equations for BMD vs. age, height, and weight were calculated. The results of this investigation indicate that DPA- and QDR-derived BMD values are comparable. BMD values derived by QDR were consistently lower than those obtained by DPA (DPA = 1.115 QDR + 0.137, r = 0.942). The L2 lumbar region was the most strongly correlated determination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2509017     DOI: 10.1007/bf02556021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  14 in total

1.  Axial bone density in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of dual-energy projection radiography and dual-photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  M O'Malley; A J Kenrick; D J Sartoris; A M Hochberg; M H Weisman; E Ramos; N Zvaifler; D Resnick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: a review.

Authors:  C E Cann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Dual energy radiography (DER): a preliminary comparative study.

Authors:  R Pacifici; R Rupich; I Vered; K C Fischer; M Griffin; N Susman; L V Avioli
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  Quantitative computed tomography in assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  H K Genant; J E Block; P Steiger; C C Glueer; R Smith
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.446

5.  Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  H W Wahner; W L Dunn; M L Brown; R L Morin; B L Riggs
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 6.  Single- and dual-photon absorptiometry in osteoporosis and osteomalacia.

Authors:  H W Wahner
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.446

7.  Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. Differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes.

Authors:  B L Riggs; H W Wahner; E Seeman; K P Offord; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; K A Johnson; L J Melton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Bone mineral density in the femoral neck: quantitative assessment using dual-energy projection radiography.

Authors:  D J Sartoris; F G Sommer; R Marcus; P Madvig
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Fracture prevalence and bone mineral mass in osteoporosis measured with computed tomography and dual energy photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  J A Raymakers; O Hoekstra; J van Putten; H Kerkhoff; S A Duursma
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs; H W Wahner; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; K P Offord; L J Melton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  9 in total

1.  Measurements of bone mineral density of the proximal femur by two commercially available dual energy X-ray absorptiometric systems.

Authors:  O L Svendsen; U Marslew; C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1992

2.  Spinal bone mineral assessment in postmenopausal women: a comparison between dual X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  W Yu; C C Glüer; S Grampp; M Jergas; T Fuerst; C Y Wu; Y Lu; B Fan; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal women: a cross-sectional study of 717 Finnish volunteers.

Authors:  H Kröger; J Heikkinen; K Laitinen; A Kotaniemi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  An evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and comparison with dual-photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  B Lees; J C Stevenson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Precision and stability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements.

Authors:  J Johnson; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Comparison between metacarpal bone measurements by computarized radiogrammetry and total body DEXA in normal and osteoporotic women.

Authors:  H Rico; M Revilla; L F Villa; J F Martin-Santos; J L Cardenas; E Fraile
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Bone mineral density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in healthy Finnish women.

Authors:  K Laitinen; M Välimäki; P Keto
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Influence of patient's weight on dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mineral density.

Authors:  P Martin; M Verhas; C Als; L Geerts; J Paternot; P Bergmann
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Influence of degenerative joint disease on spinal bone mineral measurements in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  W Yu; C C Glüer; T Fuerst; S Grampp; J Li; Y Lu; H K Genant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.333

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.