Literature DB >> 1393769

Enhanced precision with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

R Mazess1, C H Chesnut, M McClung, H Genant.   

Abstract

Repeat spine and femur measurements (5 per case) were done on 19 subjects with the DPX-L densitometer operating at 3 mA giving a radiation flux fourfold higher than the earlier DPX model. The precision for spine bone mineral density (BMD) was about 0.55% (L2-L4) and 0.48% (L1-L4) for 2-minute scans (2.4 mrem). The precision was only slightly lower (0.4-0.5%) for 4-minute scans (5 mrem) in a subset of 11 subjects. There was a slight precision advantage for the larger L1-L4 area compared with L2-L4 for 2-minute scans, but no advantage for 4-minute scans. The precision for femoral neck BMD was 1.00 and 0.85% for 2- and 4-minute scans, respectively, with proper positioning. The corresponding values for the Ward's triangle region of the femur were 2.6 and 1.5%. The precision of spine scans was influenced chiefly by variable region location. The precision of femur scans was affected by both patient positioning and location of the region. The 4-minute scans minimized the number of operator changes necessary for analysis. Precision errors can be reduced by up to 50% with utilization of the higher flux, but this does not obviate the need for care in patient positioning and scan analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1393769     DOI: 10.1007/bf00296209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  12 in total

1.  Relationship between patient exposure and measurement precision in dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine.

Authors:  J A Sorenson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray bone densitometer.

Authors:  G M Blake; C M Tong; I Fogelman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Longitudinal precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter study. The Nafarelin/Bone Study Group.

Authors:  E S Orwoll; S K Oviatt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 4.  Dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry for bone densitometry: current status and perspective.

Authors:  D J Sartoris; D Resnick
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  In vivo and in vitro precision for bone density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorption.

Authors:  J Lilley; B G Walters; D A Heath; Z Drolc
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Precision and stability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements.

Authors:  J Johnson; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Automated comparison of dual-photon absorptiometric studies of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  L F Verheij; J A Blokland; S E Papapoulos; O L Bijvoet; E K Pauwels
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  Bone densitometry of the axial skeleton.

Authors:  R B Mazess
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Precision of dual-photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  C C Shipp; P S Berger; M S Deehr; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  T L Kelly; D M Slovik; D A Schoenfeld; R M Neer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  25 in total

1.  A densitometric analysis of the human first metatarsal bone.

Authors:  C Muehleman; D Bareither; B L Manion
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Update on bone density testing.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Implementation of an osteoporosis research program with a mobile dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry unit: the Montana/Wyoming experience.

Authors:  U Ulrich; M Browning; E V Gaffney; K H Schöter; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Imaging-Based Methods for Non-invasive Assessment of Bone Properties Influenced by Mechanical Loading.

Authors:  Norma J Macintyre; Amanda L Lorbergs
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 1.037

6.  Age changes of spine density in posterior-anterior and lateral projections in normal women.

Authors:  R B Mazess; H S Barden; R W Eberle; M D Denton
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Quality assurance for bone densitometry research studies.

Authors:  C A Bassett
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Precision of dual X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral computed tomography using mobile densitometry units.

Authors:  M Wapniarz; R Lehmann; O Randerath; S Baedeker; W John; K Klein; B Allolio
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 9.  A systematic review of interventions by healthcare professionals on community-dwelling postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  P Lai; S S Chua; S P Chan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Total and regional bone mineral content in Spanish professional ballet dancers.

Authors:  A Cuesta; M Revilla; L F Villa; E R Hernández; H Rico
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.