Literature DB >> 1458339

Comparative assessment of bone mineral density of the forearm using single photon and dual X-ray absorptiometry.

J W Nieves1, F Cosman, C Mars, R Lindsay.   

Abstract

Forearm bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at proximal and distal sites by 125I single photon absorptiometry (SPA) and by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 67 consecutive subjects, aged 18-75 years. Correlations and regression equations between these two techniques were determined. All forearm measurements were significantly correlated with each other (r = 0.599-0.926; P < or = 0.0001). Although SPA and DXA correct for fat in different ways, we found similar correlation and regression equations in women with body mass index measurements above and below the mean. In addition, forearm measurements by both techniques were moderately correlated with vertebral spine and hip BMD. We conclude that overall, SPA forearm measurements in a population can be calibrated to DXA measurements if necessary, and that DXA forearm measurements are as predictive of the remainder of the skeleton as SPA measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1458339     DOI: 10.1007/bf00316879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  17 in total

1.  Relationships between quantitative histological measurements and noninvasive assessments of bone mass.

Authors:  F Cosman; M B Schnitzer; P D McCann; M V Parisien; D W Dempster; R Lindsay
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  The distribution of cortical and trabecular bone mass along the lengths of the radius and ulna and the implications for in vivo bone mass measurements.

Authors:  R A Schlenker; W W VonSeggen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Res       Date:  1976-04-13

3.  Precision and stability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements.

Authors:  J Johnson; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Comparative assessment of dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy radiography.

Authors:  C C Glüer; P Steiger; R Selvidge; K Elliesen-Kliefoth; C Hayashi; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Measurement of bone by dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

Authors:  R B Mazess; H S Barden
Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol       Date:  1988

6.  Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W S Browner; J A Cauley; H K Genant; S R Mascioli; J C Scott; D G Seeley; P Steiger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Ultradistal and cortical forearm bone density in the assessment of postmenopausal bone loss and nonaxial fracture risk.

Authors:  R I Price; M P Barnes; D H Gutteridge; M Baron-Hay; R L Prince; R W Retallack; C Hickling
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Prevention of early postmenopausal bone loss: controlled 2-year study in 315 normal females.

Authors:  C Christiansen; M S Christensen; P McNair; C Hagen; K E Stocklund; I Transbøl
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 4.686

9.  Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women.

Authors:  S L Hui; C W Slemenda; C C Johnston
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Detection of prefracture spinal osteoporosis using bone mineral absorptiometry.

Authors:  P D Ross; R D Wasnich; J M Vogel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  5 in total

1.  Radial bone density and breast cancer risk in white and African-American women.

Authors:  D A Nelson; L L Darga; M S Simon; R K Severson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Accuracy and precision study in vitro for peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  M Takada; K Engelke; S Hagiwara; S Grampp; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Densitometry of the radius using single and dual energy absorptiometry.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; M R McClung; M S Schmeer; L A Roberts; K W Gaither
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Single X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: precision, correlation, and reference data.

Authors:  T L Kelly; G Crane; D T Baran
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Automated simulation of areal bone mineral density assessment in the distal radius from high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  A J Burghardt; G J Kazakia; T M Link; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 4.507

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.