Literature DB >> 2501007

Correction of the effects of source, source strength, and soft-tissue thickness on spine dual-photon absorptiometry measurements.

B Dawson-Hughes1, M S Deehr, P S Berger, G E Dallal, L J Sadowski.   

Abstract

Dual photon absorptiometry measurements of the spine are subject to drift associated with source, source strength, and truncal thickness. This study was conducted to determine the extent to which this drift in bone mineral density (BMD) measurements can be improved by analysis of scans with a new software version, 08C, and by applying external standard or phantom corrections to scans analyzed with the older version, 08B. A phantom, consisting of human lumbar vertebrae embedded in acrylic, and five clear acrylic plates to simulate a soft-tissue thickness range of 15.2-27.9 cm, was measured on a Lunar Radiation Corp DP3 scanner over the life of a 153-gadolinium (Gd) source and scans analyzed with software versions 08B and 08C. Phantom BMD was lower with 08C at both high [0.012 +/- 0.002 (SEM) g/cm2, P less than 0.001] and low (0.027 +/- 0.003 g/cm2, P less than 0.001) count rates than with 08B. Phantom BMD of scans analyzed with 08B increased with increasing source age and the source strength-related increment increased significantly as acrylic thickness increased (P = 0.014). When the same scans were analyzed with 08C, the thickness-related effect was corrected whereas a small (0.011 g/cm2/year) source-strength effect persisted. The effects of source strength and truncal thickness on BMD were also evaluated in 40 humans scanned at two detector collimations to vary count rate. With 08B, mean BMD was 1% greater when measured with 8 than with 13 mm collimation (mean difference 0.011 +/- 0.003 g/cm2, P = 0.001), whereas the version 08C, mean BMD was the same at the two collimations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2501007     DOI: 10.1007/bf02553759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  8 in total

1.  Precision error in dual-photon absorptiometry related to source age.

Authors:  P D Ross; R D Wasnich; J M Vogel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Dual photon absorptiometric measurements of bone mineral density increase with source life.

Authors:  R Lindsay; C Fey; A Haboubi
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. Differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes.

Authors:  B L Riggs; H W Wahner; E Seeman; K P Offord; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; K A Johnson; L J Melton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Precision of dual-photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  C C Shipp; P S Berger; M S Deehr; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Total body bone mineral and lean body mass by dual-photon absorptiometry. I. Theory and measurement procedure.

Authors:  W W Peppler; R B Mazess
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Dietary calcium intake and bone loss from the spine in healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  B Dawson-Hughes; P Jacques; C Shipp
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Precision of dual photon absorptiometry measurements.

Authors:  A D LeBlanc; H J Evans; C Marsh; V Schneider; P C Johnson; S G Jhingran
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Long-term precision of dual photon absorptiometry in the lumbar spine in clinical settings.

Authors:  L Nilas; C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1988-03
  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Comparative study of the performances of X-ray and gadolinium 153 bone densitometers at the level of the spine, femoral neck and femoral shaft.

Authors:  D O Slosman; R Rizzoli; B Buchs; F Piana; A Donath; J P Bonjour
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

2.  Effect of radiographic abnormalities on rate of bone loss from the spine.

Authors:  B Dawson-Hughes; G E Dallal
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Increased risk of tooth loss is related to bone loss at the whole body, hip, and spine.

Authors:  E A Krall; R I Garcia; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Experience with the novo DPA scanner.

Authors:  P Lakatos; I Krasznai
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Precision and stability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements.

Authors:  J Johnson; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Age-related differences in total and regional bone mass: a cross-sectional study with DXA in 429 normal women.

Authors:  H Rico; M Revilla; L F Villa; M Alvarez de Buergo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Vertebral bone mineral density measured laterally by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  D O Slosman; R Rizzoli; A Donath; J P Bonjour
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Influence of body weight on rates of change in bone density of the spine, hip, and radius in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S Harris; G E Dallal; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Tooth loss and skeletal bone density in healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  E A Krall; B Dawson-Hughes; A Papas; R I Garcia
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.507

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.