Literature DB >> 28150035

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry underestimates in vivo lumbar spine bone mineral density in overweight rats.

Rim Cherif1,2,3, Laurence Vico4,5, Norbert Laroche1,2, Mohsen Sakly3, Nebil Attia3, Cedric Lavet1,2.   

Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is currently the most widely used technique for measuring areal bone mineral density (BMD). However, several studies have shown inaccuracy, with either overestimation or underestimation of DXA BMD measurements in the case of overweight or obese individuals. We have designed an overweight rat model based on junk food to compare the effect of obesity on in vivo and ex vivo BMD and bone mineral content measurements. Thirty-eight 6-month old male rats were given a chow diet (n = 13) or a high fat and sucrose diet (n = 25), with the calorie amount being kept the same in the two groups, for 19 weeks. L1 BMD, L1 bone mineral content, amount of abdominal fat, and amount of abdominal lean were obtained from in vivo DXA scan. Ex vivo L1 BMD was also measured. A difference between in vivo and ex vivo DXA BMD measurements (P < 0.0001) is evidenced with an underestimation of in vivo BMD by (8.47 ± 10.54)%. This difference was found for the chow and high fat, high sucrose diets (P = 0.008), and a significant interaction between in vivo measurements, ex vivo measurements, and diet was observed (P = 0.030). Also, the data show a positive significant correlation of ex vivo BMD with body weight, perirenal fat, abdominal fat, and abdominal lean. Multiple linear regression analysis shows that body weight, abdominal fat, and abdominal lean were independently related to ex vivo BMD. DXA underestimated lumbar in vivo BMD in overweight rats, and this measurement error is related to body weight and abdominal fat. Therefore, caution must be used when one is interpreting BMD among overweight and obese individuals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral density; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Fat; Overweight rat; Underestimation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28150035     DOI: 10.1007/s00774-017-0813-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab        ISSN: 0914-8779            Impact factor:   2.626


  38 in total

1.  The influence of tissue depth and composition on the performance of the Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer whole-body scanning mode.

Authors:  M A Laskey; K D Lyttle; M E Flaxman; R W Barber
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Human body composition: in vivo methods.

Authors:  K J Ellis
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  H W Wahner; W L Dunn; M L Brown; R L Morin; B L Riggs
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Negative association between trunk fat, insulin resistance and skeleton in obese women.

Authors:  Emanuela A Greco; Davide Francomano; Rachele Fornari; Chiara Marocco; Carla Lubrano; Vincenza Papa; Francesca Wannenes; Luigi Di Luigi; Lorenzo M Donini; Andrea Lenzi; Antonio Aversa; Silvia Migliaccio
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2013-04-15

6.  Relationship of weight, height, and body mass index with fracture risk at different sites in postmenopausal women: the Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW).

Authors:  Juliet E Compston; Julie Flahive; David W Hosmer; Nelson B Watts; Ethel S Siris; Stuart Silverman; Kenneth G Saag; Christian Roux; Maurizio Rossini; Johannes Pfeilschifter; Jeri W Nieves; J Coen Netelenbos; Lyn March; Andrea Z LaCroix; Frederick H Hooven; Susan L Greenspan; Stephen H Gehlbach; Adolfo Díez-Pérez; Cyrus Cooper; Roland D Chapurlat; Steven Boonen; Frederick A Anderson; Silvano Adami; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Errors due to non-uniform distribution of fat in dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  P Tothill; D W Pye
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Patient-specific DXA bone mineral density inaccuracies: quantitative effects of nonuniform extraosseous fat distributions.

Authors:  H H Bolotin; H Sievänen; J L Grashuis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Effect of fat on measurement of bone mineral density.

Authors:  F Javed; W Yu; J Thornton; E Colt
Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res       Date:  2009-07-01

10.  The effect of fat on the measurement of bone mineral density by digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR-BMD).

Authors:  Edward Colt; Johan Kälvesten; Kenneth Cook; Nata Khramov; Fahad Javed
Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res       Date:  2010
View more
  2 in total

1.  High-fat/high-sucrose diet results in higher bone mass in aged rats.

Authors:  Akira Minematsu; Yasue Nishii; Susumu Sakata
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2018-01-03

2.  Calycosin prevents bone loss induced by hindlimb unloading.

Authors:  Xiang Jin; Hong Wang; Xuechao Liang; Kang Ru; Xiaoni Deng; Shuo Gao; Wuxia Qiu; Ying Huai; Jiaqi Zhang; Linbin Lai; Fan Li; Zhiping Miao; Wenjuan Zhang; Airong Qian
Journal:  NPJ Microgravity       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.970

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.