Literature DB >> 3336729

Precision error in dual-photon absorptiometry related to source age.

P D Ross1, R D Wasnich, J M Vogel.   

Abstract

An average, variable precision error of up to 6% related to source age was observed for dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine in a longitudinal study of bone mineral content involving 393 women. Application of a software correction for source decay compensated for only a portion of this error. The authors conclude that measurement of bone-loss rates using serial dual-photon bone mineral measurements must be interpreted with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1988        PMID： 3336729     DOI： 10.1148/radiology.166.2.3336729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN： 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  11 in total

1.  Effective dose values in bone mineral measurements by photon absorptiometry and computed tomography.

Authors:  W A Kalender
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Precision and stability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements.

Authors:  J Johnson; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Physical activity and bone mineral density in Italian middle-aged women.

Authors:  E Bidoli; D Schinella; S Franceschi
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Menopause, menstrual and reproductive history, and bone density in northern Italy.

Authors:  F Parazzini; E Bidoli; S Franceschi; D Schinella; F Tesio; C La Vecchia; R Zecchin
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Precision of dual photon absorptiometry measurements: comparison of three different methods of selection of the region of interest.

Authors:  R Valkema; R van den Berg; J A Camps; J A Blokland; S E Papapoulos; O L Bijvoet; E K Pauwels
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1989

6.  Long-term precision of bone loss rate measurements among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J W Davis; P D Ross; R D Wasnich; C J MacLean; J M Vogel
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Long-term performance in vitro and in vivo of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J Y Reginster; R Deroisy; B Zegels; I Jupsin; A Albert; P Franchimont
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 8.  Bone densitometry: current assessment.

Authors:  H K Genant; K G Faulkner; C C Glüer; K Engelke
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Correction of the effects of source, source strength, and soft-tissue thickness on spine dual-photon absorptiometry measurements.

Authors:  B Dawson-Hughes; M S Deehr; P S Berger; G E Dallal; L J Sadowski
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Comparison of dual photon and dual energy X-ray bone densitometers in a clinic setting.

Authors:  D A Nelson; E B Brown; M J Flynn; D D Cody; S Shaffer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.199
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.