Literature DB >> 3076046

Measurement of bone by dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

R B Mazess1, H S Barden.   

Abstract

Bone densitometry is essential for (a) confirming a diagnosis of osteoporosis, (b) determining the degree of osteopenia and risk of fracture, and (c) monitoring the response of bone to therapeutic agents. Fracture risk at specific axial fracture sites (spine, proximal femur), is associated directly with bone mineral density (BMD) at these sites. ROC analysis demonstrates that the diagnostic sensitivity of spine and femur BMD for spine and/or femur fracture is substantially superior to BMD of appendicular sites in the immediate postmenopausal period. Femoral neck BMD affords high diagnostic sensitivity for proximal femur fracture even in the elderly. Recent prospective studies have shown that bone densitometry can predict future fractures in postmenopausal women. Conventional DPA with 153Gd provides high accuracy for total body, spine, and femur BMD with adequate clinical precision of 1%, 2% and 3%, respectively. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), using either switched kVp or by k-edge filtering, offers better precision; typically the precision error is halved. The higher flux available from x-ray sources provides other advantages over DPA, including: improved spatial resolution (2 vs 4 mm), reduced radiation exposure (1 vs 2 mrem), and decreased scan times (3 to 10X). Improved DPA systems, with automatic gain stabilization to minimize drift, could offer clinical precision comparable to DEXA but the scan time and spatial resolution remain as before. Both DPA and DEXA allow detection of therapeutic efficacy in individual patients over the first year or two of therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3076046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol        ISSN: 0355-9521


  22 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparative assessment of bone mineral density of the forearm using single photon and dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J W Nieves; F Cosman; C Mars; R Lindsay
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Bone mineral density changes of the proximal tibia after revision total knee arthroplasty. A randomised study with the use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones.

Authors:  Claus L Jensen; Michael M Petersen; Henrik M Schrøder; Bjarne Lund
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal women: a cross-sectional study of 717 Finnish volunteers.

Authors:  H Kröger; J Heikkinen; K Laitinen; A Kotaniemi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Bone imaging: traditional techniques and their interpretation.

Authors:  Holger F Boehm; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Accuracy and precision of lumbar bone mineral content by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in live female monkeys.

Authors:  M J Jayo; S E Rankin; D S Weaver; C S Carlson; T B Clarkson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Precision and stability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements.

Authors:  J Johnson; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Use of histological methods in studies of osteoporosis.

Authors:  I Arnala
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Bone mineral density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in healthy Finnish women.

Authors:  K Laitinen; M Välimäki; P Keto
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Interpretation of lumbar spine densitometry in women with fractures.

Authors:  S P Nielsen; F Hermansen; O Bärenholdt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.