| Literature DB >> 19305036 |
Wayne D Newhauser1, Jonas D Fontenot, Anita Mahajan, David Kornguth, Marilyn Stovall, Yuanshui Zheng, Phillip J Taddei, Dragan Mirkovic, Radhe Mohan, James D Cox, Shiao Woo.
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to compare the risk of developing a second cancer after craniospinal irradiation using photon versus proton radiotherapy by means of simulation studies designed to account for the effects of neutron exposures. Craniospinal irradiation of a male phantom was calculated for passively-scattered and scanned-beam proton treatment units. Organ doses were estimated from treatment plans; for the proton treatments, the amount of stray radiation was calculated separately using the Monte Carlo method. The organ doses were converted to risk of cancer incidence using a standard formalism developed for radiation protection purposes. The total lifetime risk of second cancer due exclusively to stray radiation was 1.5% for the passively scattered treatment versus 0.8% for the scanned proton beam treatment. Taking into account the therapeutic and stray radiation fields, the risk of second cancer from intensity-modulated radiation therapy and conventional radiotherapy photon treatments were 7 and 12 times higher than the risk associated with scanned-beam proton therapy, respectively, and 6 and 11 times higher than with passively scattered proton therapy, respectively. Simulations revealed that both passively scattered and scanned-beam proton therapies confer significantly lower risks of second cancers than 6 MV conventional and intensity-modulated photon therapies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19305036 PMCID: PMC4144016 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/8/002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Phys Med Biol ISSN: 0031-9155 Impact factor: 3.609