Literature DB >> 21076196

Estimate of the uncertainties in the relative risk of secondary malignant neoplasms following proton therapy and intensity-modulated photon therapy.

Jonas D Fontenot1, Charles Bloch, David Followill, Uwe Titt, Wayne D Newhauser.   

Abstract

Theoretical calculations have shown that proton therapy can reduce the incidence of radiation-induced secondary malignant neoplasms (SMN) compared with photon therapy for patients with prostate cancer. However, the uncertainties associated with calculations of SMN risk had not been assessed. The objective of this study was to quantify the uncertainties in projected risks of secondary cancer following contemporary proton and photon radiotherapies for prostate cancer. We performed a rigorous propagation of errors and several sensitivity tests to estimate the uncertainty in the ratio of relative risk (RRR) due to the largest contributors to the uncertainty: the radiation weighting factor for neutrons, the dose-response model for radiation carcinogenesis and interpatient variations in absorbed dose. The interval of values for the radiation weighting factor for neutrons and the dose-response model were derived from the literature, while interpatient variations in absorbed dose were taken from actual patient data. The influence of each parameter on a baseline RRR value was quantified. Our analysis revealed that the calculated RRR was insensitive to the largest contributors to the uncertainty. Uncertainties in the radiation weighting factor for neutrons, the shape of the dose-risk model and interpatient variations in therapeutic and stray doses introduced a total uncertainty of 33% to the baseline RRR calculation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21076196      PMCID: PMC4134093          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/23/S02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  33 in total

1.  Out-of-field photon and neutron dose equivalents from step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Stephen F Kry; Mohammad Salehpour; David S Followill; Marilyn Stovall; Deborah A Kuban; R Allen White; Isaac I Rosen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Indications of the neutron effect contribution in the solid cancer data of the A-bomb survivors.

Authors:  Albrecht M Kellerer; Werner Rühm; Linda Walsh
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

4.  Increased risk of rectal cancer after prostate radiation: a population-based study.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Joel E Tepper; Sara B Durham; David A Rothenberger; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Bladder carcinoma and other second malignancies after radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  A I Neugut; H Ahsan; E Robinson; R D Ennis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Effect of recent changes in atomic bomb survivor dosimetry on cancer mortality risk estimates.

Authors:  Dale L Preston; Donald A Pierce; Yukiko Shimizu; Harry M Cullings; Shoichiro Fujita; Sachiyo Funamoto; Kazunori Kodama
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Radiation dose and second cancer risk in patients treated for cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  J D Boice; G Engholm; R A Kleinerman; M Blettner; M Stovall; H Lisco; W C Moloney; D F Austin; A Bosch; D L Cookfair; E T Krementz; H B Latourette; J A Merrill; L J Peters; M D Schulz; H H Storm; E Bjorkholm; F Pettersson; C M Janine Bell; M P Coleman; P Fraser; F E Neal; P Prior; N W Choi; T G Hislop; M Koch; N Kreiger; D Robb; D Robson; D H Thomson; H Lochmuller; D von Fournier; R Frischkorn; K E Kjørstad; A Rimpela; M H Pejovic; V P Kirn; H Stankusova; F Berrino; K Sigurdsson; G B Hutchison; B MacMahon
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Second cancers in children treated with modern radiotherapy techniques.

Authors:  Uwe Schneider; Antony Lomax; Beate Timmermann
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 9.  Is there a place for quantitative risk assessment?

Authors:  Eric J Hall
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 1.394

10.  Assessment of organ-specific neutron equivalent doses in proton therapy using computational whole-body age-dependent voxel phantoms.

Authors:  Christina Zacharatou Jarlskog; Choonik Lee; Wesley E Bolch; X George Xu; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  12 in total

1.  Risk of radiogenic second cancers following volumetric modulated arc therapy and proton arc therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laura A Rechner; Rebecca M Howell; Rui Zhang; Carol Etzel; Andrew K Lee; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  ADVANTAGES OF MCNPX-BASED LATTICE TALLY OVER MESH TALLY IN HIGH-SPEED MONTE CARLO DOSE RECONSTRUCTION FOR PROTON RADIOTHERAPY.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Jonas D Fontenot; Dragan Mirkovic; John S Hendricks; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Nucl Technol       Date:  2013-07

3.  Low- and middle-income countries can reduce risks of subsequent neoplasms by referring pediatric craniospinal cases to centralized proton treatment centers.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Nabil Khater; Bassem Youssef; Rebecca M Howell; Wassim Jalbout; Rui Zhang; Fady B Geara; Annelise Giebeler; Anita Mahajan; Dragan Mirkovic; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2018-02-07

4.  Comparison of risk of radiogenic second cancer following photon and proton craniospinal irradiation for a pediatric medulloblastoma patient.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Rebecca M Howell; Annelise Giebeler; Phillip J Taddei; Anita Mahajan; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Risk-optimized proton therapy to minimize radiogenic second cancers.

Authors:  Laura A Rechner; John G Eley; Rebecca M Howell; Rui Zhang; Dragan Mirkovic; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Impact of margin size on the predicted risk of radiogenic second cancers following proton arc therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laura A Rechner; Rebecca M Howell; Rui Zhang; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Second primary cancers after radiation for prostate cancer: a review of data from planning studies.

Authors:  Louise Murray; Ann Henry; Peter Hoskin; Frank-Andre Siebert; Jack Venselaar
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 8.  A Review of Radiotherapy-Induced Late Effects Research after Advanced Technology Treatments.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Reinhard Schulte; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Inter-Institutional Comparison of Personalized Risk Assessments for Second Malignant Neoplasms for a 13-Year-Old Girl Receiving Proton versus Photon Craniospinal Irradiation.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Nabil Khater; Rui Zhang; Fady B Geara; Anita Mahajan; Wassim Jalbout; Angélica Pérez-Andújar; Bassem Youssef; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  Current concepts in clinical radiation oncology.

Authors:  Michael Orth; Kirsten Lauber; Maximilian Niyazi; Anna A Friedl; Minglun Li; Cornelius Maihöfer; Lars Schüttrumpf; Anne Ernst; Olivier M Niemöller; Claus Belka
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.