Literature DB >> 23322160

Comparison of risk of radiogenic second cancer following photon and proton craniospinal irradiation for a pediatric medulloblastoma patient.

Rui Zhang1, Rebecca M Howell, Annelise Giebeler, Phillip J Taddei, Anita Mahajan, Wayne D Newhauser.   

Abstract

Pediatric patients who received radiation therapy are at risk of developing side effects such as radiogenic second cancer. We compared proton and photon therapies in terms of the predicted risk of second cancers for a 4 year old medulloblastoma patient receiving craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Two CSI treatment plans with 23.4 Gy or Gy (RBE) prescribed dose were computed: a three-field 6 MV photon therapy plan and a four-field proton therapy plan. The primary doses for both plans were determined using a commercial treatment planning system. Stray radiation doses for proton therapy were determined from Monte Carlo simulations, and stray radiation doses for photon therapy were determined from measured data. Dose-risk models based on the Biological Effects of Ionization Radiation VII report were used to estimate the risk of second cancer in eight tissues/organs. Baseline predictions of the relative risk for each organ were always less for proton CSI than for photon CSI at all attained ages. The total lifetime attributable risk of the incidence of second cancer considered after proton CSI was much lower than that after photon CSI, and the ratio of lifetime risk was 0.18. Uncertainty analysis revealed that the qualitative findings of this study were insensitive to any plausible changes of dose-risk models and mean radiation weighting factor for neutrons. Proton therapy confers lower predicted risk of second cancer than photon therapy for the pediatric medulloblastoma patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23322160      PMCID: PMC3615542          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/4/807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  53 in total

1.  Complexity of advanced radiation therapy necessitates multidisciplinary inquiry into dose reconstruction and risk assessment.

Authors:  Wayne Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Indications of the neutron effect contribution in the solid cancer data of the A-bomb survivors.

Authors:  Albrecht M Kellerer; Werner Rühm; Linda Walsh
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Field-in-field technique with intrafractionally modulated junction shifts for craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Sue S Yom; Erik K Frija; Anita Mahajan; Eric Chang; Kelli Klein; Almon Shiu; Jared Ohrt; Shiao Woo
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Risk of radiogenic second cancers following volumetric modulated arc therapy and proton arc therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laura A Rechner; Rebecca M Howell; Rui Zhang; Carol Etzel; Andrew K Lee; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Risk of second primary thyroid cancer after radiotherapy for a childhood cancer in a large cohort study: an update from the childhood cancer survivor study.

Authors:  Parveen Bhatti; Lene H S Veiga; Cécile M Ronckers; Alice J Sigurdson; Marilyn Stovall; Susan A Smith; Rita Weathers; Wendy Leisenring; Ann C Mertens; Sue Hammond; Debra L Friedman; Joseph P Neglia; Anna T Meadows; Sarah S Donaldson; Charles A Sklar; Leslie L Robison; Peter D Inskip
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Potential reduction of the incidence of radiation-induced second cancers by using proton beams in the treatment of pediatric tumors.

Authors:  Raymond Miralbell; Antony Lomax; Laura Cella; Uwe Schneider
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT.

Authors:  Eric J Hall; Cheng-Shie Wuu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Medulloblastoma: time-dose relationship based on a 30-year review.

Authors:  J O del Charco; T W Bolek; W M McCollough; B L Maria; A Kedar; R C Braylan; J P Mickle; J M Buatti; N P Mendenhall; R B Marcus
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Advantage of protons compared to conventional X-ray or IMRT in the treatment of a pediatric patient with medulloblastoma.

Authors:  W H St Clair; J A Adams; M Bues; B C Fullerton; Sean La Shell; H M Kooy; J S Loeffler; N J Tarbell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  Management of and prognosis with medulloblastoma: therapy at a crossroads.

Authors:  Roger J Packer; Gilbert Vezina
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2008-11
View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  New challenges in high-energy particle radiobiology.

Authors:  M Durante
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  A comparative study on the risks of radiogenic second cancers and cardiac mortality in a set of pediatric medulloblastoma patients treated with photon or proton craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Rebecca M Howell; Phillip J Taddei; Annelise Giebeler; Anita Mahajan; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 3.  Proton therapy for the treatment of children with CNS malignancies.

Authors:  Radhika Sreeraman; Daniel J Indelicato
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2014-03

Review 4.  The physics of proton therapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Low- and middle-income countries can reduce risks of subsequent neoplasms by referring pediatric craniospinal cases to centralized proton treatment centers.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Nabil Khater; Bassem Youssef; Rebecca M Howell; Wassim Jalbout; Rui Zhang; Fady B Geara; Annelise Giebeler; Anita Mahajan; Dragan Mirkovic; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2018-02-07

6.  Craniospinal irradiation as part of re-irradiation for children with recurrent intracranial ependymoma.

Authors:  Derek S Tsang; Louise Murray; Vijay Ramaswamy; Michal Zapotocky; Uri Tabori; Ute Bartels; Annie Huang; Peter B Dirks; Michael D Taylor; Cynthia Hawkins; Eric Bouffet; Normand Laperriere
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 7.  Charged particle therapy--optimization, challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Jay S Loeffler; Marco Durante
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Reduce Patient Treatment wait time in a Proton Beam Facility - A Gatekeeper Approach.

Authors:  Yu-Li Huang; Amanda J Deisher; Michael G Herman; Jon J Kruse; Anita Mahajan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Recommendations for the referral of patients for proton-beam therapy, an Alberta Health Services report: a model for Canada?

Authors:  S Patel; X Kostaras; M Parliament; I A Olivotto; R Nordal; K Aronyk; N Hagen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 10.  Paediatric proton therapy.

Authors:  Heike Thomas; Beate Timmermann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.