Literature DB >> 17664589

Dosimetric impact of tantalum markers used in the treatment of uveal melanoma with proton beam therapy.

Wayne D Newhauser1, Nicholas C Koch, Jonas D Fontenot, Stanley J Rosenthal, Dan S Gombos, Markus M Fitzek, Radhe Mohan.   

Abstract

Metallic fiducial markers are frequently implanted in patients prior to external-beam radiation therapy to facilitate tumor localization. There is little information in the literature, however, about the perturbations in proton absorbed-dose distribution these objects cause. The aim of this study was to assess the dosimetric impact of perturbations caused by 2.5 mm diameter by 0.2 mm thick tantalum fiducial markers when used in proton therapy for treating uveal melanoma. Absorbed dose perturbations were measured using radiochromic film and confirmed by Monte Carlo simulations of the experiment. Additional Monte Carlo simulations were performed to study the effects of range modulation and fiducial placement location on the magnitude of the dose shadow for a representative uveal melanoma treatment. The simulations revealed that the fiducials caused perturbations in the absorbed-dose distribution, including absorbed-dose shadows of 22% to 82% in a typical proton beam for treating uveal melanoma, depending on the marker depth and orientation. The clinical implication of this study is that implanted fiducials may, in certain circumstances, cause dose shadows that could lower the tumor dose and theoretically compromise local tumor control. To avoid this situation, fiducials should be positioned laterally or distally with respect to the target volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17664589     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/13/021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  19 in total

1.  Assessment of targeting accuracy of a low-energy stereotactic radiosurgery treatment for age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Erik Chell; Steven Hansen; Michael Gertner; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Monte Carlo calculations and measurements of absorbed dose per monitor unit for the treatment of uveal melanoma with proton therapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Koch; Wayne D Newhauser; Uwe Titt; Dan Gombos; Kevin Coombes; George Starkschall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Benchmark measurements and simulations of dose perturbations due to metallic spheres in proton beams.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Laura Rechner; Dragan Mirkovic; Pablo Yepes; Nicholas C Koch; Uwe Titt; Jonas D Fontenot; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.898

4.  Effective Dose from Stray Radiation for a Patient Receiving Proton Therapy for Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Sunil Krishnan; Dragan Mirkovic; Pablo Yepes; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2009-03-10

5.  Water equivalent thickness values of materials used in beams of protons, helium, carbon and iron ions.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Phillip J Taddei; Markus M Fitzek; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Investigation of dose perturbations and the radiographic visibility of potential fiducials for proton radiation therapy of the prostate.

Authors:  Jessie Y Huang; Wayne D Newhauser; X Ronald Zhu; Andrew K Lee; Rajat J Kudchadker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  The physics of proton therapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Assessment of the accuracy of an MCNPX-based Monte Carlo simulation model for predicting three-dimensional absorbed dose distributions.

Authors:  U Titt; N Sahoo; X Ding; Y Zheng; W D Newhauser; X R Zhu; J C Polf; M T Gillin; R Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Reducing stray radiation dose to patients receiving passively scattered proton radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Jonas D Fontenot; Yuanshui Zheng; Dragan Mirkovic; Andrew K Lee; Uwe Titt; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Annelise Giebeler; Jonas Fontenot; Peter Balter; George Ciangaru; Ronald Zhu; Wayne Newhauser
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.