Literature DB >> 18670050

Assessment of the accuracy of an MCNPX-based Monte Carlo simulation model for predicting three-dimensional absorbed dose distributions.

U Titt1, N Sahoo, X Ding, Y Zheng, W D Newhauser, X R Zhu, J C Polf, M T Gillin, R Mohan.   

Abstract

In recent years, the Monte Carlo method has been used in a large number of research studies in radiation therapy. For applications such as treatment planning, it is essential to validate the dosimetric accuracy of the Monte Carlo simulations in heterogeneous media. The AAPM Report no 105 addresses issues concerning clinical implementation of Monte Carlo based treatment planning for photon and electron beams, however for proton-therapy planning, such guidance is not yet available. Here we present the results of our validation of the Monte Carlo model of the double scattering system used at our Proton Therapy Center in Houston. In this study, we compared Monte Carlo simulated depth doses and lateral profiles to measured data for a magnitude of beam parameters. We varied simulated proton energies and widths of the spread-out Bragg peaks, and compared them to measurements obtained during the commissioning phase of the Proton Therapy Center in Houston. Of 191 simulated data sets, 189 agreed with measured data sets to within 3% of the maximum dose difference and within 3 mm of the maximum range or penumbra size difference. The two simulated data sets that did not agree with the measured data sets were in the distal falloff of the measured dose distribution, where large dose gradients potentially produce large differences on the basis of minute changes in the beam steering. Hence, the Monte Carlo models of medium- and large-size double scattering proton-therapy nozzles were valid for proton beams in the 100 MeV-250 MeV interval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18670050      PMCID: PMC4131262          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/16/016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  25 in total

1.  Accurate Monte Carlo simulations for nozzle design, commissioning and quality assurance for a proton radiation therapy facility.

Authors:  H Paganetti; H Jiang; S Y Lee; H M Kooy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Monte Carlo simulations of a nozzle for the treatment of ocular tumours with high-energy proton beams.

Authors:  Wayne Newhauser; Nicholas Koch; Stephen Hummel; Matthias Ziegler; Uwe Titt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Calculations of neutron dose equivalent exposures from range-modulated proton therapy beams.

Authors:  Jerimy C Polf; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Neutron radiation area monitoring system for proton therapy facilities.

Authors:  W D Newhauser; X Ding; D Giragosian; S Nill; U Titt
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Neutron shielding calculations in a proton therapy facility based on Monte Carlo simulations and analytical models: criterion for selecting the method of choice.

Authors:  U Titt; W D Newhauser
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  Virtual commissioning of a treatment planning system for proton therapy of ocular cancers.

Authors:  N Koch; W Newhauser
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

7.  Proton beam dosimetry for radiosurgery: implementation of the ICRU Report 59 at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Karla D Myers; Stanley J Rosenthal; Alfred R Smith
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-04-21       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Flattening of proton dose distributions for large-field radiotherapy.

Authors:  A M Koehler; R J Schneider; J M Sisterson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1977 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Patient neutron dose equivalent exposures outside of the proton therapy treatment field.

Authors:  J C Polf; W D Newhauser; U Titt
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

10.  Equivalent dose and effective dose from stray radiation during passively scattered proton radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jonas Fontenot; Phillip Taddei; Yuanshui Zheng; Dragan Mirkovic; Thomas Jordan; Wayne Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  24 in total

1.  An MCNPX Monte Carlo model of a discrete spot scanning proton beam therapy nozzle.

Authors:  Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Dragan Mirkovic; Luis A Perles; Narayan Sahoo; X Ron Zhu; George Ciangaru; Kazumichi Suzuki; Michael T Gillin; Radhe Mohan; Uwe Titt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A GPU implementation of a track-repeating algorithm for proton radiotherapy dose calculations.

Authors:  Pablo P Yepes; Dragan Mirkovic; Phillip J Taddei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Adjustment of the lateral and longitudinal size of scanned proton beam spots using a pre-absorber to optimize penumbrae and delivery efficiency.

Authors:  Uwe Titt; Dragan Mirkovic; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Luis A Perles; Wayne D Newhauser; Phillip J Taddei; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Development of GATE Monte Carlo simulation for a dual-head gamma camera.

Authors:  Mehdi Momennezhad; Ramin Sadeghi; Shahrokh Nasseri
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-05-16

5.  Systematic microdosimetric data for protons of therapeutic energies calculated with Geant4-DNA.

Authors:  Oleg N Vassiliev; Christine B Peterson; Wenhua Cao; David R Grosshans; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Benchmark measurements and simulations of dose perturbations due to metallic spheres in proton beams.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Laura Rechner; Dragan Mirkovic; Pablo Yepes; Nicholas C Koch; Uwe Titt; Jonas D Fontenot; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.898

7.  Effective Dose from Stray Radiation for a Patient Receiving Proton Therapy for Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Sunil Krishnan; Dragan Mirkovic; Pablo Yepes; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2009-03-10

8.  Feasibility of proton-activated implantable markers for proton range verification using PET.

Authors:  Jongmin Cho; Geoffrey Ibbott; Michael Gillin; Carlos Gonzalez-Lepera; Uwe Titt; Harald Paganetti; Matthew Kerr; Osama Mawlawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Monte Carlo simulation of the neutron spectral fluence and dose equivalent for use in shielding a proton therapy vault.

Authors:  Yuanshui Zheng; Wayne Newhauser; Eric Klein; Daniel Low
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  The predicted relative risk of premature ovarian failure for three radiotherapy modalities in a girl receiving craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  A Pérez-Andújar; W D Newhauser; P J Taddei; A Mahajan; R M Howell
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.