Literature DB >> 20676819

[Standardized reconstruction of acetabular bone defects using the cranial socket system].

Maximilian Rudert1, Boris Michael Holzapfel, Florian Kratzer, Reiner Gradinger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Management of primary or secondary acetabular bone loss (D'Antonio type I-IV ). Implantation and stable fixation using a cementless, cranially extended oval press-fit cup to restore painless joint function and loading capacity. INDICATIONS: Septic or aseptic loosening of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular bone loss after tumor resection. Primary acetabular bone defects in developmental dysplasia of the hip. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Persistent deep infection. Bone defects including the parts of the iliac bone adjoining the sacrum (fixation of the stem in the ilium is not possible any more). SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Complete exposure of the acetabular defect using a standard approach. Removal of the loose cup. Excision of soft and granulation tissue from the acetabular ground and the rim. Reaming of the acetabulum with sequentially larger hemispheric reamers until an adequate bony bed is created for the insertion of the cranial socket. Eccentric cranial sockets without a craniolateral flap are preferable for use in type I and II defects with teardrop lysis mostly involving the craniolateral acetabulum, if a trihedral press-fit fixation can be achieved. Supplementary screw fixation through the acetabular ground, is possible. If a type III defect is present, the authors recommend the use of cranial sockets with an anatomic flap in order to increase primary stability by supplementary screw fixation. This is especially recommended for the management of deficiencies in the medial or posterior wall. If there is pelvic discontinuity (type IV), adequate acetabular reconstruction with primary stability of the component can only be achieved by a supplementary intramedullary structured stem fixed in the dorsal part of the ilium. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Partial loading of the operated limb with 10 kg for a period of 6-12 weeks. Then increased loading with 10 kg per week. Thrombosis prophylaxis until full weight bearing. Physiotherapy and gait training.
RESULTS: A total of 50 cup revisions using the ESKA cranial socket system were clinically and radiologically analyzed with an average follow-up of 65.7+/-28.5 months (26-123 months). Defects were classified according to D'Antonio. There were 21 type II, 23 type III, and six type IV defects. The Harris Hip Score increased from 40 preoperatively to 68.3 points postoperatively. Four patients had recurrent hip dislocation requiring replacement of the inlay. In four cases of aseptic loosening, the acetabular component had to be revised. With revision of the acetabular component as an endpoint, implant survival was 92% after an average of 5.4 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20676819     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-010-9003-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  43 in total

1.  Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: outcome in 164 hips followed for 2-17 years.

Authors:  Ulf J Schlegel; Rudi G Bitsch; Maria Pritsch; Martin Clauss; Hans Mau; Steffen J Breusch
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.717

2.  Periprosthetic bone loss of the acetabulum. Classification and management.

Authors:  J A D'Antonio
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry.

Authors:  G J Hooper; A G Rothwell; M Stringer; C Frampton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-04

4.  Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  J F Crowe; V J Mani; C S Ranawat
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Morselized homologous grafts in revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum.

Authors:  R Herzog; E Morscher
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  1994 Oct-Dec

6.  The Effectiveness of the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular bone deficiency: five to twenty-one years' follow-up.

Authors:  Panagiotis P Symeonides; George E Petsatodes; John D Pournaras; George A Kapetanos; Anastasios G Christodoulou; Dimitrios J Marougiannis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  The Bürch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: indications, principles and long-term results.

Authors:  T J Gill; J B Sledge; M E Müller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-11

8.  Prolonged bacterial culture to identify late periprosthetic joint infection: a promising strategy.

Authors:  Peter Schäfer; Bernd Fink; Dieter Sandow; Andreas Margull; Irina Berger; Lars Frommelt
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  [Complications after harvesting of autologous bone from the ventral and dorsal iliac crest - a prospective, controlled study].

Authors:  C Niedhart; A Pingsmann; C Jürgens; A Marr; R Blatt; F U Niethard
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug

10.  Impaction bone grafting of the acetabulum at hip revision using a mix of bone chips and a biphasic porous ceramic bone graft substitute.

Authors:  Ashley W Blom; Vikki Wylde; Christine Livesey; Michael R Whitehouse; Steve Eastaugh-Waring; Gordon C Bannister; Ian D Learmonth
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  9 in total

1.  [Revision arthroplasty of the hip: acetabular component].

Authors:  H Gollwitzer; R von Eisenhart-Rothe; B M Holzapfel; R Gradinger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Acetabular defect classification in times of 3D imaging and patient-specific treatment protocols.

Authors:  K Horas; J Arnholdt; A F Steinert; M Hoberg; M Rudert; B M Holzapfel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Treatment of acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using the Revisio-System].

Authors:  M Hoberg; B M Holzapfel; A F Steinert; F Kratzer; M Walcher; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Total hip replacement in developmental dysplasia using an oval-shaped cementless press-fit cup.

Authors:  Boris M Holzapfel; Felix Greimel; Peter M Prodinger; Hakan Pilge; Ulrich Nöth; Hans Gollwitzer; Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [Total hip replacement in developmental dysplasia: anatomical features and technical pitfalls].

Authors:  B M Holzapfel; D Bürklein; F Greimel; U Nöth; M Hoberg; H Gollwitzer; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  [Periprosthetic bone defects of the hip joint].

Authors:  D C Wirtz
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  [Partial pelvic resection (internal hemipelvectomy) and endoprosthetic replacement in periacetabular tumors].

Authors:  M Rudert; B M Holzapfel; H Pilge; H Rechl; R Gradinger
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.154

8.  Acetabular defect management and revision arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach.

Authors:  Boris Michael Holzapfel; Kristoff Corten; Tyler Goldberg; Maximilian Rudert; Michael Nogler; Joseph Moskal; Martin Thaler
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 1.154

9.  Acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification.

Authors:  Dieter Christian Wirtz; Max Jaenisch; Thiemo Antonius Osterhaus; Martin Gathen; Matthias Wimmer; Thomas Martin Randau; Frank Alexander Schildberg; Philip Peter Rössler
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.067

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.