Literature DB >> 18645969

Porous tantalum uncemented acetabular shells in revision total hip replacement: two to four year clinical and radiographic results.

W Y Kim1, N V Greidanus, C P Duncan, B A Masri, D S Garbuz.   

Abstract

In cementless revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), achieving initial implant stability and maximising host bone contact is key to the success of reconstruction. Porous tantalum acetabular shells may represent an improvement from conventional porous coated uncemented cups in revision acetabular reconstruction associated with severe acetabular bone defects. We reviewed the results of 46 acetabular revisions with Paprosky 2 and 3 acetabular bone defects done with a hemispheric, tantalum acetabular shell and multiple supplementary screws. At a mean follow-up of 40 (24-51) months, one acetabular shell had been revised in a patient with a Paprosky 3B defect. Cementless acetabular revision with the tantalum acetabular shell demonstrated excellent early clinical and radiographic results and warrants further evaluation in revision acetabular reconstruction associated with severe acetabular bone defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18645969     DOI: 10.1177/112070000801800104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   1.756


  9 in total

1.  Revision hip arthroplasty using impacted cancellous bone and cement: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Gowthaman Arumugam; Shashi Kumar Nanjayan; Conal Quah; Philip Wraighte; Peter Howard
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-23

2.  Uncemented Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components: Early Follow-Up and Failures in 599 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.

Authors:  William J Long; Nicolas O Noiseux; Tad M Mabry; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

3.  Trabecular Metal cups for acetabular defects with 50% or less host bone contact.

Authors:  Dror Lakstein; David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Yona Kosashvili; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  S Mehdi Jafari; Benjamin Bender; Catelyn Coyle; Javad Parvizi; Peter F Sharkey; William J Hozack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Smoking may be a harbinger of early failure with ultraporous metal acetabular reconstruction.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Ryan C Jefferson; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of trabecular metal systems and antiprotrusion cages in acetabular revision surgery with severe defects: a comparative study.

Authors:  Irene Isabel López-Torres; Pablo Sanz-Ruíz; Coral Sánchez-Pérez; Ricardo Andrade-Albarracín; Javier Vaquero
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Cup-cage construct for massive acetabular defect in revision hip arthroplasty- A case series with medium to long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Dan Arvinte; Manish Kiran; Manoj Sood
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04-25

9.  Multiple Acetabular Revisions in THA - Poor Outcome Despite Maximum Effort.

Authors:  O Bischel; J B Seeger; Jb Seeger; M Krüger; M Krüge; R G Bitsch; Bg Bitsch
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-11-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.