Literature DB >> 18534494

Management of severe bone loss in acetabular revision using a trabecular metal shell.

Xavier Flecher1, Scott Sporer, Wayne Paprosky.   

Abstract

We investigated the early results of trabecular metal components in 23 acetabular revisions associated with major bone loss. The mean age was 58.2 years. According to Paprosky's classification, there were 17 type IIIA and 6 type IIIB acetabular defects. Eight chronic pelvic discontinuities were intraoperatively assessed. No additional plating or bone grafting was necessary. The mean postoperative modified Postel-Merle d'Aubigne score was 10.6 points (8-12 points). The mean postoperative position of the center of rotation was 26.3 mm vertically (15-47 mm). The mean inclination was 45.1 degrees (20 degrees-63 degrees). No mechanical failure occurred at a mean follow-up of 35 months (24-50 months). Trabecular metal components appear suitable to achieve primary stability in type III acetabular defect as an alternative to bone graft and cages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18534494     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  29 in total

1.  Revision hip arthroplasty using impacted cancellous bone and cement: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Gowthaman Arumugam; Shashi Kumar Nanjayan; Conal Quah; Philip Wraighte; Peter Howard
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-23

2.  Trabecular Metal cups for acetabular defects with 50% or less host bone contact.

Authors:  Dror Lakstein; David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Yona Kosashvili; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Managing acetabular fractures in the elderly with fixation and primary arthroplasty: aiming for early weightbearing.

Authors:  Mark Rickman; James Young; Alex Trompeter; Rachel Pearce; Mark Hamilton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Acetabular revision arthroplasty using trabecular titanium implants.

Authors:  Boris Steno; Milan Kokavec; Libor Necas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Do revision total hip augments provide appropriate modularity?

Authors:  Matthew G Teeter; Douglas D R Naudie; James L Howard; Richard W McCalden; Steven J MacDonald
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Surgical technique: a cup-in-cup technique to restore offset in severe protrusio acetabular defects.

Authors:  Thomas J Blumenfeld; William L Bargar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Smoking may be a harbinger of early failure with ultraporous metal acetabular reconstruction.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Ryan C Jefferson; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Histological ex vivo analysis of retrieved human tantalum augmentations.

Authors:  Stefan Breer; Michael Hahn; Daniel Kendoff; Matthias Krause; Till Koehne; Carl Haasper; Thorsten Gehrke; Michael Amling; Matthias Gebauer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  [Arthroplasty for osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia: Problem-oriented treatment strategies].

Authors:  K P Günther; M Stiehler; J Goronzy; W Schneiders; A Hartmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.