Literature DB >> 20878280

Long-term results for minor column allografts in revision hip arthroplasty.

Paul T H Lee1, Guy Raz, Oleg A Safir, David J Backstein, Allan E Gross.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While acetabular structural allografts provide an important alternative for reconstructions, concerns remain with long-term graft resorption, collapse, and failure. Midterm studies of minor column (shelf) allograft suggest reasonable survival but long-term survival is unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore assessed long-term graft/cup survivorship, functional scores, radiographic resorption, and complications associated with minor column allograft.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 74 patients (85 hips) with a mean age of 54 years (range, 28-83 years) undergoing acetabular cup revision using a minor column allograft. A minor column allograft was used in uncontained acetabular bone defects sized between 30% and 50% of the acetabulum. Graft failure was considered to occur when the graft required revision with another graft, metal augment, reconstruction cage, or excision arthroplasty. The minimum followup was 5 years (mean, 16 years; range, 5.3-25 years).
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (27 hips) had rerevision for all causes at a mean time to rerevision of 6.9 years (range, 0.1-23). Fifteen grafts failed at a mean time-to-rerevision of 6.1 years (range, 0.5-23.2). The 15- and 20-year Kaplan-Meier survivorships were 61% and 55% for cups and 78% for grafts with rerevision for all causes as end point. With rerevision for aseptic loosening as end point, survivorships were 67% and 61% for cups and 81% for grafts. The mean modified Harris hip scores were 41 (range, 20-60) preoperatively, 73 (range, 40-95) at 1 year postoperatively and 73 (range, 26-93) at last followup.
CONCLUSION: The data may provide a long-term benchmark by which future treatments for Type III defects can be measured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20878280      PMCID: PMC2974884          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1591-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  22 in total

1.  Periprosthetic bone loss of the acetabulum. Classification and management.

Authors:  J A D'Antonio
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  Safe zone for transacetabular screw fixation in prosthetic acetabular reconstruction of high developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Q Liu; Y X Zhou; H J Xu; J Tang; S J Guo; Q H Tang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Survivorship analysis in the evaluation of joint replacement.

Authors:  F Dorey; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; P G Perona; J M Lawrence
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Average ten-year follow-up.

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; Michael O'Rourke; Paul Chong; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Minor column structural acetabular allografts in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  I G Woodgate; K J Saleh; G Jaroszynski; Z Agnidis; M M Woodgate; A E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ariane Gerber; Markus Pisan; David Zurakowski; Balz Isler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Salvage total hip reconstruction in patients with major acetabular bone deficiency using structural femoral head allografts.

Authors:  M Jasty; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-01

Review 9.  Bone grafts in hip replacement surgery. The pelvic side.

Authors:  A E Gross; D G Allan; M Catre; D S Garbuz; I Stockley
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Classification and reconstruction in revision acetabular arthroplasty with bone stock deficiency.

Authors:  D Garbuz; E Morsi; N Mohamed; A E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  12 in total

1.  [Treatment of acetabular defects with the trabecular metal revision system].

Authors:  G I Wassilew; V Janz; C Perka; M Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Sridhar R Rachala; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Continued good results with modular trabecular metal augments for acetabular defects in hip arthroplasty at 7 to 11 years.

Authors:  Michael R Whitehouse; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  [Allogeneic bone transplantation in hip revision surgery : Indications and potential for reconstruction].

Authors:  G A Ahmed; B Ishaque; M Rickert; C Fölsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  George W Fryhofer; Sireesh Ramesh; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-12-02

6.  The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects.

Authors:  Yuanqing Mao; Chen Xu; Jiawei Xu; Huiwu Li; Fengxiang Liu; Degang Yu; Zhenan Zhu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Bone grafts, bone graft extenders, substitutes and enhancers for acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luca Pierannunzii; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13

8.  Structural and Morselized Allografting Combined with a Cementless Cup for Acetabular Defects in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 4- to 14-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Hou-Tsung Chen; Cheng-Ta Wu; Tsan-Wen Huang; Hsin-Nung Shih; Jun-Wen Wang; Mel S Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  The patient-specific Triflange acetabular implant for revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with severe acetabular defects: planning, implantation, and results.

Authors:  M E Berend; K R Berend; A V Lombardi; H Cates; P Faris
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.082

10.  Cup-Cage Solution for Massive Acetabular Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chao-Xin Wang; Zi-da Huang; Bai-Jian Wu; Wen-Bo Li; Xin-Yu Fang; Wen-Ming Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.